2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by goat@sh.itjust.works to c/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

we know

And they're somehow surprised they're not getting more donations.

[-] Kttnpunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

lmfao this explains everything about the fediverse right here

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I’ll never understand anybody who isn’t skeptical of what America tries to say about it’s enemies anymore. I don’t know if there’s a genocide happening in China. But most of the world except the United States seems to think there isn’t. And that’s a big fucking red flag to me.

If there is one happening and people are being propagandized into denying it, I blame the United States whole heartedly for the embarrassing amount of disinformation they shit out on a daily basis about China.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

And this most of the world is...?

Because the United Nations most certainly recognises the genocide, as do many other independent human-rights organisations. oh and the leaked documents.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

lol and of course now we hear crickets

[-] rbhfd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Was gonna refer to the UN rapport as well before I saw your comment.

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Wait you blame the US for you denying the Uyghurs are being wiped, because checks notes they're telling you about it ?

[-] Slotos@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

I’ll never understand this US-centric, bigoted dismissal of anyone and everyone through the lens of American exceptionalism.

You are the problem you so loudly complain about.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That’s because American exceptionalism is a lie and you’re too stupid to see that.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

They're not arguing for american exceptionalism, dude

[-] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago

Looks like more of a semantics argument to me.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That's why we refer to international organisations, or the United Nations

[-] AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

UN is not calling it a genocide though? The entire report your link refers to does not mention genocide. It does make a clear point of massive discrimination etc though ä.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

The UN can't classify acts as genocides as per its rules. However, it can supply resources for independent international organisations to come to their own conclusions, in which case, most classify it as a genocide.

[-] redballooon@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This link doesn’t support the claim that the UN called these events a genocide. It lists all sorts of human rights violations on a massive scale, but it doesn’t use the word genocide.

I suppose the crux of the matter is that it was the USA, not the UN, and then some of its close allies who named the events a “genocide”.

After this the frontiers harden, nobody talks any more about the actual events, but about the terminology.

[-] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

The UN can’t classify acts as genocides as per its rules. However, it can supply resources for independent international organisations to come to their own conclusions, in which case, most classify it as a genocide.

[-] yata@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is what the genocide denier wants you to think. It obviously isn't a semantics argument though.

[-] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one -1 points 11 months ago

I still wouldn't base my entire opinion on someone over one discussion regarding whether something is or isn't a genocide. I hope he doesn't like diet coke or chew with his mouth open.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1281 readers
160 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate-speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of bias)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

If you're violating instance rules, you'll typically be warned. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last seven days, but repeat infractions will have longer sentences. You may ask to be unbanned.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS