this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
864 points (99.0% liked)

News

32107 readers
4443 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The majority of the sweeping tariffs Donald Trump imposed during his second term face one final litmus test that will determine whether he can continue to levy them – and also whether businesses are eligible for massive refunds.

That potentially dramatic turn in the tariff saga comes after a federal appeals court ruled on Friday that Trump unlawfully leaned on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose across-the-board duties on countries.

Trump had used those powers to push import tax rates as high as 50% on India and Brazil – and as high as 145% on China earlier this year.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Around $6000 to my small business. I’m sure the Supreme Court will side with Trump though.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah F that.

American consumers need to get the refund, not the corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

No worries , you have a supreme court good at ruling by vibe.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Increasing the uncertainty is not necessarily beneficial either. Businesses won't want to keep changing their pricing. People don't want to plan their purchases around whether tariffs are likely to change up or down in the future. Their instinct will be to wait.

The tariffs were illegal in how they were implemented but Congress could easily do it and would follow his instructions as they have done before.

It's a shit show, as expected.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Republicans are so fucking stupid. They imposed a stupid tax on all of us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

AKA: Trump's standard delaying tactic whenever he gets ruled against.

Appeal everything no matter how ridiculous, just to waste time and allow him to keep doing whatever shitty thing for a few more months/years until all appeal venues are exhausted.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

And then the businesses will pass that refund onto the consumer, right?... Right?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Seeing that our Judicial branch is limping along, and at least attempting to curtail this march toward totalitarianism, gives me hope.

I'll be pleasantly surprised if this happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Those businesses will never see a goddamn cent

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

He’s already spent it on bling from Kohl’s.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 6 points 6 days ago

Thanks CNN. Now the Supreme Court justices know their asking price

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›