this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
19 points (78.8% liked)

The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk

241 readers
1 users here now

Dunking on Liberals from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Dems keep working with trump to approve his picks, but what they won't accept is that if you sit down at a table with nazis, the only thing that's changed is the number of nazis at the table. @_cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules:

We allow posts about liberal behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion.

Sister community: !tankiejerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Inspired by !tankiejerk@lemmy.world

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Labour is way past that. Kier Starmer has engorged himself with lobby funds so much he’s acting almost worse than the Conservative Party in the Uk.

Labour is a party of no one but capital.

And is literally eugenicist. What fucking “left wing”, party, cuts disability benefits, plunging an expected hundreds of thousands into poverty, than legalises assisted dying for disabled people. Within the same month.

That’s about as close to exterminating as you can get under neoliberal logic.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

They all work for the same oligarchs. So it makes sense that core policy wouldn't change.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jfc. Did this really just happen?

[–] Womble@piefed.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They made a slight change so that people with low levels of disability wouldnt get as much support and paired it with making getting a job not cut off all disability benifits immediately. When that change got huge amounts of pushback from labour MPs they watered it down. Then a private members bill (So coming from an individual MP) with no support from the government got passed allowing people who have less than six months to live get assistance in ending their own life if they get approval from a panel of a judge and care experts, that change has overwhelming support in the country.

The grandparent post is catastrophising.

[–] FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The government’s own statistics showed it would drag 250’000 into poverty.

Please don’t minimise it. Losing PIP as a disabled person can kill. Ie. just one case of many

Even the UN and Amnesty International have condemned the cut is problematic source

So please don’t call disabled people who have very real concerns about their survival with this bill “catastrophising”.

[–] Womble@piefed.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The same research that you are quoting also said there were 200,000 who were willing and able to work but prevented from doing so as they would lose their benefits as a result. Not that it matters as the government backed down under pressure from its back benchers.

Trying to frame that as tantamount to exterminating is catastrophising.

[–] FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The government hasn’t backed down. It passed the bill with a timing delay.

[–] Womble@piefed.world -1 points 1 month ago

They are not going to be applying any changes to anyone currently on pip, I fail to see how that isn't backing down.

Even if they hadn't backed down, which they did, you would still be wrong to call it extermination.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So finally we have proof for what we already knew. It was democrats voting for Trump or staying home that lost the election.

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't run a fascist next time I guess

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I told them not to, but they did it anyways.

[–] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

how the fuck did one of you wind up on "anarchist.nexus"?

edit: no covfefe yet, sorry comrade. you can probably see how I read that as being a votescold though.

related issue, it might be time for a purge of habitual downvoters in this community to pre-emptively cut back on invasive shitlibs. just an uncaffeinated thought though.