this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
166 points (97.7% liked)

World News

49155 readers
2107 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung Display has scored an unprecedented victory against its rival BOE for stealing its OLED technology.

In 2023, it filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Chinese firm BOE with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC).

Samsung recently won that lawsuit, and the commission's ruling is expected to effectively ban BOE's products from entering the USA.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Barberserk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Who posts news from a corporate "news" site? Sammobile? Really? Fuck that and fuck Samsung too, with their mobster cartel practices.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is really political. No american company was banned for losing a lawsuit related to patent violations. Normally companies just have to pay money for violations

[–] FatCrab@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

No, this is just a really stupid headline. The ITC is specifically a body that bars products found to be infringing from importation into the US market. It cannot allow award damages but the bar can be circumvent by a deal with the patent owner. This is literally the function of this particular body.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

It's not like China stealing tech wasn't their modus operandi for decades. This is just more of the same.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now BOE just needs to sell the technology to their completely independent wholly owned subsidiary, COE....

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They’ll manufacture and relabel the products like most big corps

What’s that shell game where you guess where the ball is. Same same but with paper companies and a factory

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

China's complete disregard for payments is bad...

But so is the American patent system, due to lobbyist from giant corporations like Disney essentially writing our patent laws.

The best answer is shorter term patents, it's not only a choice between the two existing systems.

[–] keimevo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Not that I don't agree with your sentiment, but patents (technical methods to build machines, do stuff, etc.) are different from copyright (stories, characters, etc.. the one Disney has exploited for decades).

[–] thatcrow@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 day ago

Copyright and patent laws need to die.

To think otherwise is to be a useful idiot, which is the norm.

[–] thatcrow@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Copyright and patent laws need to die.

If you're cheering for this, than you're a useful idiot who now has to pay higher prices for the same product.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The whole idea of intellectual property is bonkers. Imagine charging people for hearing your voice, that's the logical conclusion of monetizing intellectual property.

Capitalism needs to die.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While this is I think a win for IP law, I think the entire IP system is long overdue for an overhaul.

[–] thatcrow@ttrpg.network -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get rid of the entire thing.

If you can't protect your own ideas, you shouldn't have billions of dollars of taxpayer resources to protect them for you.

All the resources wasted enforcing copyright and patent laws, which themselves exist solely to increase the price useful idiots have to pay, could be spent doing anything else that is actually beneficial for us.

Anyone who honestly believes that necessary work wouldn't get done without copyright and patent laws is a moron going to bat for people richer than him. It's unfortunately the default state for most of us at this point.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I spent 2 years perfecting this method, now I'm next to broke, how do I make use of my invention to make money if some rich mass manufacturing company can come and simply copy my design?

[–] thatcrow@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I spent 2 years perfecting this method

No you didn't.

how do I make use of my invention to make money if some rich mass manufacturing company can come and simply copy my design?

You mean how do you get a monopoly on an idea so you can be another piece of shit taking advantage of morons who don't know any better? I'm sure the useful idiots would be glad to give you tips on how to fuck them over so they can live vicariously through you while working service jobs. Watch.

Anyone who honestly believes that necessary work wouldn’t get done without copyright and patent laws is a moron going to bat for people richer than him. It’s unfortunately the default state for most of us at this point.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You seem to be quick to deny the amount of effort needed to invent something new that is actually useful.

What would your say should then be the main motivator for anyone to invest the (however much you think might be needed) effort needed to invent something new and useful?

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if you remove money from the equation, would you do the same thing you're doing right now?

Necessity is the mother of invention. Not money. Money is just the necessity RIGHT now because the leaders you elect are only interested in themselves just like you are. If people bothered to rise up above their base desires we can do more than say "toil all your life or die".

Do you really feel like all the advancements of the past 200 or so years have made our daily lives easier?

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah, that's what you were getting at. Yes. Of course I'm right there with you to seize the means of production.

But after that's done, I'm quitting rnd and going home to subsist on my monthly ration of 5m long baguettes and 20L jars of mustard. Someone else can work in the dangerous chem lab. If they want to.

Also, yes. In the past 200 years, inventions borne from the motivations of capitalism have brought us indoor plumbing and refrigeration. If you feel that these are meaningless, I invite you to go without it for just a day.

Actually, indoor plumbing has had a long history, so perhaps to be specific: the flushing toilet.

Also I could do with refrigeration for a day. Perhaps the microwave?

I'm not even sure why I'm debating with you - I'm against patents just as much, if not more. But short of a much better 'don't even need to think about it' alternative, the dilapidated patent system is still necessary (amongst other methods of IP protection) in this capitalism driven world.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Now do Huawei.