this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
127 points (94.4% liked)

Centurii chan

305 readers
78 users here now

Posts and discussion about comics (and, sometimes, associated media) by the artist centurii-chan.

They have a history of edge-posting - nothing that the current mod considers outright racist, sexist, or otherwise hateful, but problematic enough that you may want to look elsewhere for horny comics.

While you're here, abide by the following rules or face a ban :

  1. Don't be dicks to each other.
  2. No hate speech, racism, sexism.
  3. Posts should be related to centuriichan comics.
  4. Mark NSFW posts as NSFW.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Artist: Centurii-chan | Bluesky | XCancel

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't leave negative reviews anymore. I once was mad enough at a game that I left a six or seven paragraph review. I had loved the artwork, really liked the concept, and then the game was just... so annoying. I had to go back and edit the review after a day because I couldn't imagine the creator (it was a one person game) reading some parts. I think if I had made a game and read what I wrote, I would cry. Especially because the game seemed to be a way for the creator to deal with some of his life's trauma. Now I just click the thumbs down and move on.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Divinity: Original Sin 2

Played it through twice. Mile wide, inch deep, and on invisible rails. Iinsane tonal shifts, overly convoluted story in an attempt to hide how dumb it is, characters abruptly talking completely out of character, nonsensical (and bugged) initiative system, multiple completely non-functional and absolutely useless mechanics (crafting in particular). Plus an XP system designed with such mind-numbing ineptitude that it's actually possible to softlock your game by leveling wrong, which they fixed by adding infinite respecs. Complete waste of massive potential.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Haven't played the 2nd but, in the 1st one, it was always hilarious when one of my characters after a fight went "oh, that was easy" just for the other to reply "no thanks to you, you fucking moron". Seriously, why did they do that?

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet you played through it twice, can't have been too bad

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I was pretty sure I hated it while I watched the asinine credits sequence, I played it all the way through again with another character to give it another shake and ended up being vindicated. It's that bad.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Given the "Games as a service" model a lot of gaming has shifted to nowadays, this could be totally valid criticism of so many games to come. Like, say they shut the servers down or insisted they wouldn't patch a wormable and actively abused exploit but didn't remove the game from the store or even discount it... (looking at you, Activision/CoD)

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Rainbow 6 Siege. I fucking hate that game, but you play for that one magical round where everything comes together

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What game were you putting 86 hours into in 1989, despite thinking it sucks?

The games out in '89 were simple enough, you'd know they sucked within a couple hours, and then stop.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

Not 86 hours, 86 thousand hours. I assume the idea is that she's obviously played it obbsesively, then left a useless negative review when she got frustrated.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Also wondering if the review being posted on tax day has any significance. Was this person playing this game to avoid doing their taxes?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dragon's Dogma 2.

I loved the first one. But the second one had all the same problems the first had, plus more, plus a stupid story that ends in the most unsatisfying way (even getting the true ending). I don't know why it was as well received as it was, even though it did get slammed for the ending and performance issues, I've never heard anything negative about the rest of it. The only good thing I can say about it is the medusa and sphinx stuff was fun. Everything else was annoying as fuck.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

how many hours did you spend on it?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Over 100 hours with 100% achievements. Mostly because I spent $70 for it and couldn't refund it (PS5) so I made sure to at least get my damn money's worth forcing myself to completely finish it.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Over 100 hours with 100% achievements.

hoooleeee

[–] thegreatloofa@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

15th of April 1989? The Hillsborough Disaster?

[–] officialdakari@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I too, have now lost the game. 😵

[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 4 points 2 weeks ago

Games I don't play but from second hand experience csgo, wow, tarkov

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oaken Tower.

Currently only a demo.

Makes me wish everyone who plays it has their monitors explode on them.

To quote my Steam review of it:

I used to think the death penalty was cruel... then I started playing the demo for this game.

It's another reminder why I avoid autobattlers

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Neon Abyss, 20 hours overall, 15 at the time of review.