this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
18 points (87.5% liked)

Linux

10083 readers
622 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shareni@programming.dev 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

how to install arch (with btrfs and without frustration)

Download Endeavour and click through the wizard?

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Nooooo, you will have that heavily bloated Plasma desktop! That won't run properly on my 4GB Raspberry Pi (it does)!

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

You can choose the de by clicking in the wizard

[–] meekah@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Plasma was hell on my x230 (gen3 i5 + 4gb ram), it only worked properly with 8gb. Is it different somehow for ARM versions of Linux?

[–] xylol@leminal.space 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

isnt it the same with arch? at least when I tried arch I just clicked through the install menu

[–] Samueru_sama@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

isnt it the same with arch?

I once to helped troubleshoot an EndeavourrOS user.

during the process I discovered that their kernel parameters were being reset with every kernel update, this was because Endeavour was using dracut instead of mkinitcpio...

[–] pyssla@quokk.au 1 points 3 months ago

during the process I discovered that their kernel parameters were being reset with every kernel update

That's pretty horrid. They ought to have fixed that since. Right?

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Damn, the last time I used it I could've sworn it was just arch with a wizard and some custom dotfiles. Although that was like 3 years ago.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

I never actually used archinstall, only manual and derivatives which were essentially arch with a wizard.

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Heed the 'downside' of using btrfs carefully before choosing that option over say, ext4, especially if you ever do a hard-shutdown, prone to power-outages, etc. It will scramble your system files.

[–] Samueru_sama@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

especially if you ever do a hard-shutdown, prone to power-outages, etc. It will scramble your system files.

Btrfs is made precisely so that a power outages don't do that! and you don't end up like ext4 with bad superblock nonsense.

Been using Btrfs for over 3 years at this point, 0 issues and over 400 unsafe shutdowns: https://imgur.com/a/AKXFdKb

In fact it was able to detect when my previous ssd was dying, I thought Btrfs was spewing nonsense until the next day when smartctl began to report issues as well lol.

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have had corrupt filesystem errors with BTRFS on both of my computers due to power outages and one hard shutdown (had to), that was the end of it. I will stick to ext4, a log file system that is more stable. Used ext4 for YEARS (I am old) and never had these issues with such frequency. Stick to what is hardened and solid, BTRFS is still under development. The fanboys love to use it as the next best thing, and it does have some nice features, but stability is not one of them, at least in these type of situations.

[–] Samueru_sama@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I have had corrupt filesystem errors with BTRFS on both of my computers due to power outages and one hard shutdown (had to)

When did this happen? what error did you get?

Btrfs will explicitly go read only when it detects corruption, which is a good thing, with EXT4 you don't know what is going on until it is too late.

fwiw the only time I managed to get info from an user that had "issues" with btrfs, I discovered that what had happened is that they moved the partition that had snapshots, and if you don't know it, this is catastrophic because this unlinks all the snapshots and suddenly everything would take many times more storage.

Used ext4 for YEARS (I am old) and never had these issues with such frequency

The short time I've used EXT4 running into bad superblock errors was something that happened almost every week, but in the end I was always able to repair the disk and recover everything.

I'm from Venezuela, power failures are common here.