this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
143 points (84.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8323 readers
231 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

What I love about this picture is if you zoom in you can tell her face couldn't have a more bored expression

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There were over 500 other politicians who endorsed this; but I think she built her brand among those who feel particularly betrayed. And there is also a dose of misogamy, here and there.

But why do people feel so betrayed after older votes and actions should have triggered this much earlier? And will most of this go away soon?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 week ago

She became a strikebreaker three years ago. Kshama Sawant: Rail Workers Betrayed By Biden & The “Squad”

AOC justified her vote by claiming she was fighting “tooth and nail” for the additional sick days. Jamaal Bowman claimed he was “always fighting in solidarity with the workers.” But what the Congressional “Progressive” Caucus pulled was a con job, and a hamfisted one at that. They colluded with Pelosi to separate out the vote into two, promising their roughly 100 votes on the rotten TA in exchange for a separate vote on the sick day amendment, which they knew full well would get crushed in the Senate. It took only one day to confirm the brutal reality: that the majority of the “Squad,” in coordination with the leaders of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, sold rail workers down the river while blowing smoke about paid sick days.

On November 30, Democratic Socialists of America’s (DSA) national center posted a statement of support for the rail workers which included this sentence:

“Any member of Congress who votes yes on the tentative agreement is siding with billionaires and forcing a contract on rail workers that does not address their most pressing demand of paid sick days.”

What then of their own members and endorsed elected officials in Congress who voted yes? What this statement implies, and what the actions of the “Squad” definitively prove, is that these elected officials are, and see themselves as, part of the capitalist state, the state that acts for the billionaires and against the interests of the majority, the working class.

A socialist cannot be a strike breaker. This needs to be the end of any pretense by DSA that the “Squad” is socialist, and should result in their expulsion from the organization. Failing that, the Squad’s betrayal of the working class becomes DSA’s betrayal.

[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We have very few progressive voices in the government, it sucks to have them betray principles we thought they had

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They are politicians and they all get elected based on lies to their base.

AOC didn't even grow up in Bronx and campaigned hard on her being a girl from Bronx. If she was willing to lie about where she grew up, why wouldn't she spout bullshit to appeal to her constituents?

[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

AOC calls herself a Bronx girl but also as far as i can tell, always admitted that while being born in the Bronx she moved to a nearby town as a child and went back and forth regularly to see family there. I'm not from NY so maybe I'm not the one to ask, but it doesn't seem that wild that she considers the Bronx part of her personality.

I'd rather be mad at her for substantive things like this vote.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago

Well born in the Bronx. It's not technically a lie, but it's misleading. Cozying up with Mama Bear Pelosi says it all, though.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wait we have at least one ? A real one?? Where??!

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

"progressive" doesn't mean "leftist". Sometimes they agree on policy, but the progressive is just a brand of liberal. I mean, we're talking about a term embraced by Teddy Roosevelt and prohibitionists

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 week ago

But why do people feel so betrayed after older votes and actions should have triggered this much earlier? And will most of this go away soon?

Many still hope for the magical day when the dems become something that they structurally cant be. They love the idea more than the fact, of what these people represent. Same with Mamdani, tbh. People will be very heartbroken about him soon enough.

Too much "benefit of the doubt" is given, too much projection and power-level hiding cope and "they mean well". They long to be heard and hear screams in whimpers.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 5 points 1 week ago

Hatred of marriage?

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

I forget where I heard this analogy, but it's like giving a bulletproof vest to someone on their way to shoot up a school.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

AOC: Always Offing Civilians

[–] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know who 'murikkkans despise more than Trump and the Republicans? The weak ass, spineless, do nothing, stand for nothing, fqracking Democratic Party.

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know who 'murikkkans despise

Black people and minorities, merikans despise black people and minorities

[–] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You mean like the Democratic Party using racism and bigotry to attack Mumdani?

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That post was nine days ago… coincidence?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Incivility? I've never seen that from this user. Nor whining and complaining in lieu of self-validation or self-reflection. In fact, the time we got into a conversation about pogroms, I found them extremely respectful and informative, as well as in good faith.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago

The hypocrisy of that instance is stunning.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't believe how much much she sucks on the issue of Gazan genocide. Total disappointment

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How did AOC end up on pro israel side? AIpac got her too?

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Israel has a right to defend itself"

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

that's the party narrative, comrade

[–] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Anytime you send weapons to theocracies, people die. Religions are never happy with what they have, because a fictional god gave them the entire world. So they fight, kill, and die for their fictional gods.

NEVER send weapons to theocracies.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The problem with Israel isn't Judaism. Israel doesn't even follow the Halakha. Israel is a racist settler colony most similar to Apartheid South Africa. Without religion you still have politicians in New Zealand attempting to pass racist laws.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Iran is a theocracy, and I’d send them nukes if I had any.

Religion is less of a factor in state geopolitical decision-making than you think.
It’s just one facet of the superstructure among many.

[–] Sandouq_Dyatha@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

many fail to see that even the crusades were never about christianity or the church, they were always about plundering resources.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

This might destroy you from the inside but Israel is an Atheist state. The only Judaism they believe in is being racially descended from Jews.

https://vridar.org/2017/05/26/we-do-not-believe-in-god-but-he-nonetheless-promised-us-palestine/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›