For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
It drives me crazy how people say Kamala's election would have been a better outcome. Yes, her presidency in a very, very proximate sense would have been less malignant, but allowing a dem to win by pivoting even further right than Biden and literally endorsing crank Republican policy points like the wall would be catastrophic if your window of observation extends past 4 years.
Right?! They have no far-seeing view. Okay, so Kamala wins from pivoting right, then the Republicans move more right, so the Dems will move right. How does no lib see that this eventually leads to the Dems shedding every group but maybe one more than the Republicans to appease the "moderate" (read: fascist) voter? Probably either white cis women or rich black cis people? The "who else are you going to for" logic only takes you so far if you want to actually help people's material conditions.
It's awful the shit Trump is doing. And I would've loved it if Harris was elected, both to remove the spectacle of facsim, including this ICE shit, and so I could've rubbed it in every lib's face when she kept doing the same shit as Biden, and I could use it to radicalize people away from the Democrat Party, instead of them being able to pretend the alternative universe where Harris is winning is sunshine and rainbows right now.
But, if we want an actual opposition party that represents us: the EM PoC's, trans people, immigrants, working-class, etc; then the opposition party needs to be punished for moving right. So in that way, I'm glad she lost.
Why would you want to maintain allies who are committing genocide
Liberals will gladly offer up any minority group to the fascist Gods as long as they can maintain their comfort of doordash, funko pops, and unlimited access to porn.
The most important thing to them is feeling like they are fighting the power, while not sacrificing anything to do so. This is why they hate us so much; we break the illusion that they are doing any fighting at all. We remind them that they are, in effect, terrible people.
libs make my blood boil 
I know the meme is tired, but: Vote 100% Hitler, the other guy is 102% Hitler!
The percentages aren't even different any more; it's "Vote Blue Hitler because he has the more defensible motives"
vote blue hitler because there'll be less spectacle around his crimes
Vote Blue Hitler because his speeches are more boring
It's more like "I vote for 120% Hitler, which is what MLK would do, because Six-Score-Percent Hitler is using backward nomenclature, something that we shouldn't be encouraging in our modern society because we care about human welfare"
“We are not the same”
They're really embracing the 99% Hitler position
And after 99% Hitler wins: "Folks, unfortunately we had to pass the bill to get out of this deficit... and that means we're going to increase the Hitlerism by 1%. I know, I know, calm down, it's only until the next election. Remember to donate!"
There's something just so...disgusting about Blue MAGA. Like, far fouler than CHUDs. I think it is the way they act like things like supporting a genocide are somehow "moral" acts because "the republicans would be worse." Never any evidence of that, and it has long gone past the most extreme conclusion you could go to with that sort of thing, even as a hypothetical.
The CHUDs proudly wear their inhumanity on their sleeve, but Blue MAGA act like their reprehensibility is actually just a "strategic decision" and somehow makes them the more moral party. The Nazis back in the day would've behaved a lot more like Blue MAGA than the CHUDs, cloaking their reprehensible actions in the language of Capitalist Realism, "There's no other option for us" "We didn't want to to come to this but now we have no choice".
A lot of Nazis would be somewhat closer to Republicans, let's be honest. The Nazis characterized the violence as self-defense, but so do even the foulest Zionists. If you want a comparison point for the Dems, look at the liberals across Europe and the Anglosphere who enabled the Nazis.
There's something just so...disgusting about Blue MAGA. Like, far fouler than CHUDs.
Marx put it best: “[Vulgar economy] confines itself to systematising in a pedantic way, and proclaiming for everlasting truths, the trite ideas held by the self-complacent bourgeoisie with regard to their own world, to them the best of all possible worlds.”
What are liberals if not the intellectual heirs of the same vulgar economists?
Chuds on the other hand are basically anti-systematization. They’re willing to acknowledge the obvious, to override their own models when they fail. Of course, the ends are still evil, but without the pretense.
It's the implication that you are in fact evil for not supporting their rendition of the same genocide. It is suggesting that calls to not genocide are weakening the movement to put rainbows and smiley faces on the graves of children.
Chuds are openly evil. They relish in it. Dems try to sell evil under the trojan horse of harm reduction, effectively trying to neutralize the only real opposition to evil.
Something something foxes and wolves.
I wonder what the strategic ally wants to do with the land after finishing the genocide. I’m sure their reasons are a lot better than building condos since it apparently justifies a genocide. 
But seriously, they are defending funding genocide but aghast at the concept of getting a kickback for funding the genocide? The liberal mind is a marvel.
“I can excuse a genocide, but I draw the line at graft!”
Because libs reject the idea of "The ends justify the means" instead preferring "the means justify the ends." It doesn't matter how awful the end result is, or how good things become in the end, the only thing that matters to the lib is that they behave in a "civil" way while doing things, including genocide. So as long as Israel has enough "decorum" they don't give a shit as to what happens.
It is okay to do a genocide as long as you look solemn doing it.
Protection and promotion of capital in a noble, sophisticated sounding way versus protection and promotion of capital in a vulgar sounding way.
:captain-obvious: "Remember, kids, if you accept genocide as fait accompli and resort to parsing out differences in motives, you are no longer on the moral high ground."
I suffer psychic damage every time I venture into a reddit comment section
Both are equally bad because the bottom line is that you are funding a genocide. Billbord is a fascist genocide apologist.
They were literally doing seminars about the new waterfront property investments in Gaza during the Biden administration. Here's an ad ran by an Israeli real estate company that later backtracked this as a """"joke:""""
These are the people calling us genocide deniers.
what idealism does to a mofo