this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
170 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24791 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Another round of immigration judges received an email on Friday informing them they are being let go, NPR has learned, adding to the growing list of immigration court personnel cut by Trump amid his efforts to speed up deportations of immigrants without legal status.

15 immigration judges learned that they would be put on leave and that their employment would terminate on July 22, according to two people familiar with the firings and a confirmation from the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE), a union that represents immigration judges. The two people spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looking on from the outside, every piece of news sounds like "the avalanche has gathered more debris and more speed and causes even more devastation". It's horrible. Never in my lifetime have I watched the implosion of a democracy in real time. Looking at Germany in the 1930s must have felt similar.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

This is undeniably true. If democracy were still here, the news would have been more judges brought on to speed up process. But removing judges to speed things up? That absolutely means they are not following the law and removing impediments.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So I know this is going to be a dumb question under fascism times but I still have to ask:

How exactly are judges, who are under the judicial branch, being fired by the president of the executive branch?

[–] FatCrab@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Immigration judges aren't judicial judges, they are what are called administrative judges and do fall under the executive branch. That said, there is a lot of administrative law and procedure that is certainly still getting fucked by Trump/maga.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In other words: the breaking points were already built in before Trump came to power. Frankly it's a miracle it took so long for someone to just take full advantage of all of them at once.

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

unfortunately we can no longer rely on their incompetence

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All of Trump's appointments and hires have been based on compliance, and nothing else. Well, actually, competence may be a negative and honesty is completely unacceptable.

Yup. They fired the Abrego attorney who had the temerity to admit to the court that his deportation was in error. It's a liability to be honest.