Shirts That Go Hard

5262 readers

746 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2

Community Rules

No racism, xenophobia, sexualism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content

Also, follow the Terms of Service/rules of Lemmy.World.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TehBamski@lemmy.world

[New Rule Vote] - AI Content on Shirts That Go Hard (July 2025) (lemmy.world)

submitted 20 hours ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/shirtsthatgohard@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've read and pondered your collective input from the other rule vote.

I wanted to gauge the community consensus on AI content in general on Shirts That Go Hard. Should we allow AI generated content to be posted here?

Please vote here >>> https://strawpoll.com/B2ZB9jYQjgJ

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TheSaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Remember kids, always say NO to AI slop

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 70 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Simply, no. It's not 'fictitious shirts that go hard'. If it hasn't been made from materials, printed, stitched etc, it is slop that doesn't belong.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago

100%. If it’s AI, it doesn’t go hard. It doesn’t go anywhere.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 16 hours ago

I'll block the community if AI generated content is allowed.

[–] Beastly.gr@piefed.social 33 points 18 hours ago

No AI. Nothing but real shirts. You’re better than that. We’re better than that.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago

The less AI sludge anywhere online the better, in my opinion

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

Only physically real shirts.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 18 hours ago

Don't want "ai" here.

I also wouldn't really want fake shirts made with Photoshop by hand. AI is worse though.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 11 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Curious about an edge case: what about photos of real shirts that have obvious AI content printed on them? My vote would still be to not allow it.

[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

I would vote the opposite, if it's a real shirt then it doesn't matter what made the shirt content

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit: Oops, misread that comment. Was thinking AI on the photo of a real shirt instead of AI on the real shirt.

I'd reluctantly allow it, but it would be less likely to get an upvote from me if I can tell.

~~There would still not be a real shirt having that content, so what would be the point?~~

~~I feel the same about human drawn or edited shirts - unless someone actually created it physically then it's just an idea and not a shirt that goes hard.~~

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If someone goes through the trouble of ordering/printing it, buyin/selling it, and wearing it, at that point I'd consider it a real shirt.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh! I misinterpreted the top-level comment, and was thinking of a photo of a (possibly blank) real shirt that later had AI stuff added to the photo.

Hmm. A real shirt with AI Slop on it would indeed be a corner case, I guess it would count, but it'd only upvote if it goes Very hard.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh I agree. If it goes Super Hard then all this AI nonsense has been worth it, TBH.