this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
47 points (81.3% liked)

Linux

12568 readers
363 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Original question by @POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Gecko Linux because it's OpenSuSE Tumbleweed with all the useful nonfree stuff included.

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 7 months ago

I use Arch, btw, but I don't consider it the best (yes I do.) I could easily transition to Fedora, for example (I would never do that,) and be completely happy (I would rather continually hit my head with the metal stapler gun on my desk.)

[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 26 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 10 points 7 months ago

No further arguments needed.

[–] Unattributed@feddit.online 3 points 5 months ago

The one, the only, the legend...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 25 points 7 months ago

Does what I want and gets out of my way.

[–] UNY0N@linux.community 21 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Bazzite just works, it runs every game I have with zero fuss, it's easy to run Windows programs / emulators / local LLMs, AND it's basically unbreakable.

[–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I can't claim it's the best, but it's the best for me right now.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

On a gaming laptop I'm using Aurora because KDE Plasma btw (:

[–] OnfireNFS@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Bazzite has a KDE version too. I think it is more popular then the GNOME version of bazzite actually. At least according to the results of the latest steam survey

[–] PolarKraken@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep I use KDE-flavored Bazzite and actually forgot GNOME was even offered! It works deliciously. Came over from Windows last winter finally and boy, the UI alone is just so much nicer.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I had avoided KDE for years due to some multi-screen resolution issues back in the day.

I'd be running gnome, and install a half dozen plugins to make it look and feel closer to Windows It was just a personal preference. Every other update some plugin I was using would be broken. I'd replace it with another plug-in or uninstall it and wait for a fix. Fight fight fight fight fight fight. Some number of years later I tried KDE again, and I realized that it did exactly what I was trying to do in Gnome but it did it out of the box.

I don't have anything against Gnome. The same way I don't have anything against OS X's "window manager" or even Windows 11's "window manager" they're just not my preference.

Bottom left navigation, thin, stacked app indicators, bottom right tray. Fractional scaling, widgets.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Mint is Ubuntu minus everything that makes Ubuntu annoying. That's why I like it.

I considered to go back to Debian but... eh, I'm too old and impatient for that. Nowadays I mostly want things that work out of the box.

[–] DesolateMood@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do things not work out of the box on debian?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

From what I remember*, there was always some rough corner. Such as the wi-fi, or the graphics card. Sure, Stable was rock solid, but you always needed something from Testing; and Testing in general was overall less stable than Ubuntu or Mint.

*This was years ago, so it might be inaccurate as of 2025.

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Linux Mint has a Debian Edition (LMDE) if you ever wanted a Debian that Just Works.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I did use the first LMDE for some time, and I loved it, it's a great distro. I don't recall why I went for the Ubuntu-based Mint later on, I think it was the PPAs?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It isn't, it is the least bad

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Which technically makes it the best, doesn't it?

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No because best implies it's good. Least bad doesn't transmit the same message as best.

Yeah that's fair.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

NixOS. My entire config is source-controlled and I can easily roll back to a previous boot image if something breaks like cough Nvidia drivers. I also use it for my home router and all self-hosted services.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

maniacally laughs while trying to avoid eye contact with 19k lines of nix config

[–] dwt@feddit.org 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Out of all the ways that I have tried in the past, to reproduce not just the initial state, but also the ongoing changes of a disto (ansible, saltstack, chef, bunch of Shell scripts) — nix is by far the shortest. With all of these technologies I would never have dreamed to do this for a single Maschine. But now it’s not only possible, but actually gasp enjoyable!

Mind you, if that is not the problem you want to solve, maybe install just the nix package manager in addition to your distribution, and learn to enjoy it without having to run your whole distribution this way.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 7 months ago

You misunderstand! It has also turned into basically a hobby (and recently, a job, lol) to manage nix configs.

Those 19k lines are clean, well-structured and DRY, and do describe every little thing about ca. 30 machines.

[–] leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 7 months ago

I don't know that it is objectively the best - but its the best fit for me right now (LMDE).

[–] dhampirdamsel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

I've been enjoying EndeavourOS over the past three years. It works wonderfully out of the box at default settings, and was really easy for me to use and set up to my liking with minimal know-how needed.

It also works really well on the variety of machines I have in my home. My desktop, modded Chromebook, and my husband's laptop.

It's allowed me to get more familiar and confident with the command line, and enough so that I've switched to Sway from XFCE (and previously KDE).

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago

I'm convinced it isn't.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago

Mine's the best, because it fits with what I want. Might not be your best, but it's mine.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

This week alone I've used Arch, Ubuntu, OpenSuse, and Fedora. Its Arch. By a short way, and mostly thanks to the wiki. Tbh they are all converging, and I go with KDE variants when I use a GUI and no distro does too much to customise it

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago

Because it was my first distro that got me away from Windows. And yes, it's Mint.

[–] poinck@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (6 children)

For a long time I considered Gentoo the best, because I know my things around there. A month ago I said goodbye to my last Gentoo installation in favour for Debian trixie (the next stable release). Gentoo was too time consuming despite the binary repo.

If it would be my job to maintain a Gentoo system I would gladly accept, but there should be a need for it by the users. Otherwise I would just recommend Debian stable or Fedora.

My favourite is Debian over Fedora, because I often don't need the latest versions of a software. And there is flatpak.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 5 points 7 months ago

It works, has the packages I need and they are up-to-date

[–] Beanie@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because I like compiling everything from source for a 0.2% speed improvement

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randomwords@midwest.social 5 points 7 months ago

Void made Linux fun again for me. It gets so much right with the rolling release model.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Because I can hit "next" a couple of time and have a working install

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago

openSUSE Slowroll and Secureblue are my favorites ATM. Slowroll for gaming, Secureblue for mobile device. Both are hardened for security because that matters to me.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today 4 points 7 months ago

It's extremely stable, and countless other distros are derived from this.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I use NixOS, btw (don't you see that glorious gif?). It's the only distro that is actually different compared to other distros. It's not just another package manager, another ubuntu skin, or a different desktop environment. If you learn how to configure it, you can easily redo breaking changes or install an exact copy of your system on a different device. You can configure all you want and you will never ever have to worry.

Also has better flex than Arch users.

cons

  • burj khalifa learning curve
  • arch documentation * -1 doc quality (dogshit documentation)
  • doesnt work outta the box
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I use Arch since approximately 2006 or so. I like its stability (yes!), performance, rapid updates and technical simplicity. It never stands in my way and it's fairly simple to understand, administer and modify. It's probably the most convenient OS I've ever used - sure it takes time/effort to set it up but once you're past that it's smooth sailing. It also doesn't change dramatically over the years (it doesn't need to) so it's easy to keep up with its development. Plus, I have a custom setup script for it that installs and sets up all of the basics, so if I ever need to reinstall, I'm not starting from zero.

I am eyeing NixOS as "the next step" but didn't yet experiment with it too much. Arch is just too comfy to use and the advantages that NixOS brings aren't yet significant enough for me to make any kind of switch to it, but I consider NIxOS (as well as its related technologies like the Nix package manager) to be the most interesting and most advanced things in the Linux world currently.

If you're reading this as a newbie Linux user: probably don't use any of the two mentioned above (yet). They're not considered entry-level stuff, unless you're interested in learning low-level (as in: highly technical) Linux stuff from the start already. NixOS/Nix in particular is fairly complex and can be a challenge even for veteran Linux admins/users to fully understand and utilize well. Start your journey with more common desktop distros like Mint, Fedora, Kubuntu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jakeCubes@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Can't say it's the best, but I love Alpine. It's light, fast, versatile and easy to use, runs on anything, and despite it being used mostly in containers and VMs, it makes for a great desktop distro aswell. :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emotional_soup_88@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://uwuntuos.site/ obvi?

But seriously though, Arch all the way, because it teaches me about Linux and computers, because I can customize all the packages at OS install (without the need for lengthy compiling like Gentoo) and because my Steam games work flawlessly on it.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FYI, Gentoo has official binhost now, so emerge does not have to compile the package for you any more. But you still can, if you want. Like if you want to choose different useflags, use saved configs, apply patches, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nobara: It works well most of the time and has pretty much everything needed for gaming preinstalled. I had a bad update once that prevented booting past the command line though. Now that I'm more experienced I'd probably use a more mainline distro and install the gaming stuff myself.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's decent, but screw using someone's personal distro. Glorious literally dropped every scrap of his default de config, and switched to another. No transition, no migration, just deleted everything and went on with his day.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Unattributed@feddit.online 2 points 5 months ago

Mine's best for me:I get it set up the way I want, the updates are frequent but not too frequent, and it has all the packages I need.

My choice isn't necessarily (or even likely) the best for everyone. There's a lot to consider when selecting (or recommneding) a distribution. It's not a one-size-fits-all scenario.

load more comments
view more: next ›