106
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

I want to see the images imposed on each other as suggested would occur if the hinge was in place

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Damn. That is one firm boob.

[-] Dr_Decoy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If I dust off the old Art History learnings, the Madonna would have been painted in a way that appeared other-worldly so as to separate her from what any mere mortal would identify as human. Said differently, Mary’s boobs have to be painted in a way that don’t look like human boobs so humans 1) don’t get lusty in church and 2) retain their awe of the story and its characters and thus maintain the Christian power structure.

[-] engityra@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, if you're breastfeeding they do get like that sometimes, but the placement of the boobs so far apart is what weirds me out

[-] wjrii@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Somebody has a bad case of capsular contraction and needs to sue her plastic surgeon for malpractice.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There's room for a third one in there.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Around 1455, a medieval French painter and miniaturist named Jean Fouquet painted a small diptych with two panels, one of which depicts St. Stephen holding a strangely shaped stone—usually interpreted as a symbol of the saint's martyrdom by stoning.

The left panel depicts Etienne Chevalier, who served as treasurer to King Charles VII, clad in a crimson robe while kneeling in prayer.

Just last year, Monja Schünemann of Chemnitz University of Technology suggested that Fouquet painted the two panels so that folding them reveals a hidden image.

Past technological studies revealed that Fouquet had corrected the heads of both Chevalier and St. Stephen in such a way as to ensure that certain points in the painted image would meet up in a specific way when the hinged diptych was closed.

Co-author Steven Kangas, an art historian at Dartmouth, had long been fascinated by the jagged stone in the left panel because it looked like a prehistoric tool.

Rather, numerous recorded oral histories describe such objects as "thunderstones," since it was believed they "shot from the clouds" whenever lightning struck the ground—although at least one 16th-century German scholar, Georgius Agricola, dismissed that popular belief.


The original article contains 585 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Saved 67% (the content)

Kept 33% (the filler)

[-] brsrklf@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago

It is kind of a miss, yeah. Missing both the prehistoric axe and what happens when the pictures are superimposed. They reveal it in the article, but check the linked paper in the article for the illustration.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
106 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
1654 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS