Wikipedia's list of largest protests in the U.S.
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
645 points (99.7% liked)
politics
24214 readers
2777 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It was the first protest I've ever attended.
It won't be the last.
I keep seeing estimates of everything from that 4-6 million up to 11 million or even 13 million.
I also saw estimates of 5 million for the Hands Off protests and these were definitely a lot bigger than that (certainly at least twice as big at my location), so either the Hands Off one was over-estimated or the 4-5 million for No Kings is underestimated.
Isn’t it still significantly smaller than Earth day 1970? I’d also like to see how it compares to percentage of population since the US has more people now than when other big protests took place. But still, good job America.
Biggest protest in US history so far.
The next one will probably be No Kings 2 combined with anti Iran war protests.
I was gonna say. Now we get to add anti-war protesting to an already lengthy list of complaints. This is going to get huge.
You want to protest the war? We have a whole anti-trump protest movement already warmed up and ready to go. C'mon in.
This 110%!
load more comments
(5 replies)
The protests show you have support. Find ways to resist ice
You see masked people with guns don't engage with them or ask for ID. That's dangerous for you, and it's not your job.
Instead, immediately call 911 and report a group of masked individuals with guns at your location.
You just need to get in the way. Slow them down. It works
i wonder, what do you, personally, think of slashing ice's car's tires? Do you think it's too violent, or is it just right?
the idea behind it is to "not let them get away with it".
I.e., when ice shows up in a place to disappear citizens, instead of driving away with these people, they get stuck because they can't drive away. This way, they don't get away with it.
Destroying property, as long as it's not somebody's home, is not violence in my opinion. Government vehicle? Fucking go for it.
What ice is doing is not legal. Unidentified masked kidnappers should be met with resistance. Resistance is not the same as slashing random car tires.
Why can't resistance include slashing ~~random~~ ICE's tires?
Historically, a regime falls when around 3.5 percent of the general population protest. You can do it, US, I believe in you!
I think the statistic of 3.5 is more of a symptom rather than the cause of a regime's fall. For 3.5% to protest means that:
- Anger has reached a high level in the general population (a lot lot higher than 3.5%),
- The state of affairs is dire enough and hopeless enough that the trust that the system can improve on its own is very very low.
Probably other reasons.
Protest by itself achieves exactly jack shit. It's a tool, effective in conjunction with all the others, but you can't expect any change if you just put 3.5% of people on the streets. They will fuck around aimlessly, and then go home.
Yes - it's a signal that a large fraction of the population is mad, it's not the protest that does it but rather the fact that there's so many people involved in opposing the regime that it becomes difficult for the regime to act and easier for the population to find like-minded to fight back.
It's the willingness to act that makes a difference.
it's at best a warning sign and a way to organise and prepare actual riots
once movement starts hurting the economy, regimes will collapse.
BS stat.
Correct stat, but it's not like you get to 3.5% and then the regime magically falls. There's context around that. It requires keeping up the pressure.
We can't fizzle out the way the George Floyd protests did.
And yet a different auditing group says it was 13.14 million protesters.
The other day I was seeing 13.1 million people, now I'm seeing 4-6 million, these are some big gaps.
A ton of people either way, but anyone know why the discrepancies are so big?
I can't even imagine how people are counted for things like this. The one I went to was in a town of about 100k total people so I'm sure it was on the smaller side of things, but if asked how many people were there I'd guess around 2000, but that would still just be a completely wild guess essentially. Is that how they count attendance for these things, wild guesswork?
The 13M type numbers came out early and captured a lot of attention but didn't have much legitimacy, but they anchored people's expectations. The smaller numbers are coming out now and have much more legitimacy. They may be smaller but in the big picture this is all still impressive, the movement is big and growing
I saw 13.1 million come out from the alt national parks Facebook several days after seeing 5-11 million estimate. From that post it seems like they had people at each protest doing the work, whereas the others are back of the napkin estimates. So I'll go ahead and accept the absolute minimum conservative estimate being 4 million, while probably actually 10+ million.
Apparently that alt parks account is super weird and q-like.
They had "140k" members counting protesters (they claim). Seems made up.
For now I'm sticking with the low-but-verifiable numbers. Otherwise we leave ourselves open to being ignored the next time (on numbers/data).
load more comments
(4 replies)
The numbers only count if it’s constantly repeated, otherwise it’s just a sort of a national holiday.
“Here in the USA, we are so progressive that we actually protest 4 times a year”
view more: next ›