Failed rocket launch by the US. I have tapes of two field operatives talking about it in the shittiest American accent you have ever heard.

I don't know whether this is good or bad. Does anyone know whether the blast condemns Hamas?

As long as no one hits one of the two US carriers on station in the area there should be no worry about the US resorting to nukes. It's something like an aircraft carrier getting sunk that would cause the kind of psychic damage required for US leadership to have an irrational knee jerk response involving nuclear weapons.

on a side note: does anyone else hate how because the people of the US are uniquely fkd in the head and have enough nuclear weapons to leave the earth lifeless, the rest of the world has to keep in mind what kinds of events might cause the US to have a complete collective freak out? In recent years I keep thinking about how throughout all of human history hegemonic empires would rise and fall but never before has the decline of an empire come with the very real danger that as they destabilize it could result in them killing everyone on earth rather than just themselves and their neighbors. It feels like being locked in a room with another individual who is experiencing deteriorating mental health and is in possession of a hand grenade no one can take away from them without risking setting it off.

I tend to not really worry about the US deployment of nuclear weapons at our current stage. If they use them, in a way they lose their leveraging power. Which is why they have been threatened to be used in so many of the wars the US has created, but only deployed twice, when it was only the US who had access to them. I remember one article I read recently that pointed this out in the context of the invasion of Korea. Despite both Korea and China not having nuclear weapons, and the US feeling a strong desire to use them, it never happened, and the US lost anyway. There were strong considerations for using nuclear weapons in the invasion of Vietnam as well, with the same result. It is what Mao referred to when he described the imperialists as paper tigers. When actually pushed, their cowardice is shown. Isn'treal is demonstrating this now I think, given how immensely incompetent its response to the resistance has been, and the fact that it keeps hesitating to send a ground invasion. It is not in their interest to do all the things they threaten to do, I think. At least not yet? It could change if it was undeniable, even to the most deeply unhinged supporters of the settler colony that their own defeat is inevitable. Which, while it seems to us that it may be, to the settlers. there is still this notion that they have the right to what they have stolen, that it is god's gift to them, etc. They cannot imagine a world without isn'treal just as the colonial occupiers of the various African colonies thought their reign was permanent. So their state of panic, I think, is not yet to the point of something as drastic as a nuclear attack.

Mohammed Al-Deif told the world from the start of Al Aqsa Flood: it is Jihad until victory or martyrdom 🫡

The more they push the thinner the wests resources get. Now is the opportune moment for other countries to push back. The west has given everything they can to Ukraine and Isn'treal. Their economy is a zombie that doesn't realize it's already dead. Shits crumbing and every country that pushes back is a another chunk taken out.

Yes, the west's brutality is often visited upon the helpless and that disparity leads to overestimation of their abilities. When they start losing wars, they just drop napalm on children.

I love it when the trash takes itself out

oh yeah I'll believe that when me shit turns purple and tastes like orange sherbet