this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
278 points (99.6% liked)

News

37400 readers
1665 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Republican tax bill approved by the U.S. House of Representatives would cost the poorest Americans roughly $1,600 a year while increasing the income of the wealthiest households by an average of $12,000 annually, according to a new analysis released Thursday by the Congressional Budget Office.

Middle-income households would see a boost of roughly $500 to $1,000 per year under Republican President Donald Trump’s tax bill, the CBO found.

The cuts to the lowest-income households come from proposed cuts to social safety net programs including Medicaid and a food assistance program for lower-income people, known as Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Surely we can boost the high earners more than that?! Are the poors really making enough sacrifices here?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

$12K isn’t even enough for those high earners to even notice or care.

[–] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

These numbers should be taken with a massive grain of salt.

The bill is far too expansive to give reliable estimates. Even those in similar income brackets will realize very different outcomes, depending on their individual circumstances. But yes, generally the poor and working class will suffer financially, and the wealthy will benefit. Those closest to either end of the wealth spectrum will see the greatest of these effects, which will be far beyond the figures predicted here.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

No, they care about every little drop of blood they can suck

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They aren't going to stop until it's just peasants and billionaires.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago

Aka the Middle Ages

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Sounds just like Dark/Middle Ages

[The Dark Ages is] marked by economic, intellectual, and cultural decline

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

They read Yanis Vourofakis's new book and thought technofeudalism was a manifesto.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And the poorest will feel that $1600 painfully. The richest won't even notice the $12000.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I disagree. The richest are such greedy, vile scumbags that they'll notice it long enough to chortle with glee.

But then yeah, they'll promptly forget all about it.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't think this is anywhere close to describe the real effect of the trillions the big ugly bill gives in tax cuts to the rich.

Just a quick example: 2 trillion spread evenly on ALL Americans including pensioners and children, would give every American almost $7000 per year each!

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Holy shit, someone's getting fired at the CBO! How dare they put out honest data.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

All this and tariffs too!

[–] Embargo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Ahh... The old backwards Robin Hood maneuver.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

And yet the poor GOP voters will still blame immigrants.