this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
92 points (96.9% liked)

Selfhosted

46672 readers
641 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi,

As the title suggests: what are alternatives to syncthing that are basically fire and forget, works on multiple device types, and just focuses on file syncing?

I've had over the months the weirdest problems with syncthing, and lately I noticed some of my photos got corrupted, which is an absolute no no for me. I use syncthing currently as a easy automatic backup of documents, photos and other files, between my PCs and my phones (they all send only to the server. Folders are not shared with other devices).

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SanPe_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I use roundsync for Camera upload. Works well.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What about Nextcloud? It's heavier than syncthing, but would be an alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How is rclone fire and forget? You have you manually run it every sync, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ah, just one question - is your current Syncthing use internal to your home network, or does it sync remotely?

Because if you're just having your mobile devices sync files when they get on your home wifi, it's reasonably safe for that to be fire-and-forget, but if you're syncing from public networks into private that really should require some more specific configuration and active control.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Syncthing runs encrypted anyway.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

Encrypting the connection is good, it means that no one should be able capture the data and read it - but my concern is more about the holes in the network boundary you have to create to establish the connection.

My point of view is, that's not something you want happening automatically, unless you manually configured it to do that yourself and you know exactly how it works, what it connects to and how it authenticates (and preferably have some kind of inbound/outbound traffic monitoring for that connection).

[–] ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Great question. I forgot to mention but at this point syncthing is only accessible on my WiFi at home. No VPN to it and no remote locations.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How about Unison, Resilio, or Seafile ?

[–] ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Never tried unison or resilio can check. As for seafile, that is what I had before. At some point I realized I was getting several issues with desktop mostly, and the storage was only accessible from seafile wich in my case I am not OK with. Mostly was the inconsistencies between oses

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›