this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
1978 points (99.0% liked)

pics

19899 readers
2561 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You are a hero

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hitagi@ani.social 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He has a Samson Meteor microphone. Same as mine. He is cool in my book :D

I have the same shityy little speakers too, good for the price point though

[–] vocornflakes@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Any Inkscape pros know the best way to combine two pdfs using it? The page creation menus are clunky to me, and it's hard to keep the pages in order.

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago

I'm not a pro but do some shit from time to time. Between Inkscape and Gimp I never needed anything else for images. Of onlh Gimp had better tools for animated gifs... still serviceable tho haven't tried the new Gimp yet.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 92 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

those dollars were not adobe's to lose but users' to save

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 24 points 11 hours ago

This is the heart of the matter. You can't lose what you never had.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Thank you, Mr. Owens. From the bottom of my heart. InkScape is my favourite graphics tool.

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 402 points 16 hours ago (13 children)

I disagree with that framing, someone not buying your shit is not the same as you losing money. Inkscape saved millions for graphic designers, which is very different. Adobe was not entitled to that money, you can't lose something that was never yours.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 165 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Subtle distinction, but actually pretty huge. I agree with you. Companies also use this to say that pirating is stealing, when they never had the business in the first place.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 35 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. I'm pirating because I can't afford to pay hundreds of dollars each month to watch all the movies and shows that I do. If I didn't have the opportunity to pirate, I still wouldn't afford it legitimately...

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 14 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

It's also a great way to demo games and other software if you can afford it before you waste money on something that has no value to you. This is especially useful when you're on a tight budget.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 16 points 14 hours ago

Just put in your credit card for the 7 day trial! Totally easy to cancel, pinky promise

[–] Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 16 hours ago

"I bought a lottery ticket and didn't win. I lost 50 millions dollars!"

  • adobe
[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 19 points 13 hours ago

You are right, of course, but I personally draw a great of pleasure from imaging the CEO of Adobe screaming, "CURSE YOU MARTIN OWENS!!!"

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 17 points 15 hours ago

I had exactly 0 intention of ever buying anything from Adobe.

Inkscape gave me an alternative to the high seas. And it happens to do everything I need it to, although it's way more powerful than the simple vector graphics conversions I use it for.

10/10, Adobe never lost money from me getting Inkscape. They lost the game before they knew I was a player.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] twt@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

The only time I used Adobe Illustrator was when it was brand new, in 1987. I may have used early versions of Photoshop, but never as my "daily driver." So I might not be the most knowledgeable about Adobe software.

But the thing I MOST resent Adobe for was buying and killing Macromedia... I really really liked Macromedia Fireworks (raster, vector, and object graphics editor). Fireworks could do a lot of the things Adobe software could for a fraction of the price AND without having to use multiple applications to get the job done.

Inkscape is remarkable, and maybe someday someone will merge some raster image object tools into it, and then it might begin to resemble the Fireworks of 20 years ago when Adobe killed it.

[–] lillo@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 12 hours ago

Kudos to Mr. Owens and all Inkscape developers. Inkscape is a masterpiece.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Hitchhikers Guide on the bookshelf, nice.

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

He's a hoopy frood who knows where his towel is.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

I see Pratchett, Making Money up there, too. I like this guy.

[–] PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 hours ago

Making Money, the best Moist Von Lipwig book. Even better.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Is Mr Owens British perchance?

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

I've designed banners and flags in Inkscape, convention signage, even electoral campaign materials like business cards, handcards, campaign signs. A great tool

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I appreciate him very much, OSS maintainers and devs dont get enough praise. Also I dont get the intense entitlement some people have towards unpaid OSS devs and mainatiners, they think that they somehow deserve a product equal to that of a corporate offering while not offering any money or code.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 29 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It's because they haven't thought about it.

They're so used to the paradigm. I pay money. I get product. I get support.

So when they get the product but they don't pay money, their brain short circuits and thinks they deserve some kind of support.

In a capitalistic world, communistic projects are confusing. Which is sad.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

People equate “cost” with “value”. If something has no cost, it has no value. There’s an old story about computer mice that is apt. An electronics store sells computer mice. Some are expensive, some are cheap. The store has found that one specific mouse is really really reliable. Some of the more expensive mice get constant warranty returns or RMA requests. But not this one mouse. This one mouse is built well, feels good, and works great. Every single desk in the store is using one of these mice. And this specific mouse also happens to be extremely cheap. As in, one of the cheapest that the store carries.

Sales floor employees struggle to sell it, even when they personally use it every day and know it’s a superior product, because customers see the low price and assume it is a low quality product. The customers are directly equating cost with value. And so the store manager does something sort of backwards. They increase the price of the mouse, to be around the same price as the others. Suddenly, this specific mouse is flying off of the shelves. People are now seeing the high price, and assuming that means the mouse is good.

Another place you experience this is when helping your family with tech support. Every single IT worker has experienced the “you updated Chrome on my computer six months ago, and now it’s broken. You broke my computer” complaint from a tech-illiterate relative. They see a friend or relative with a computer issue, they know how to solve said issue, they try to be helpful, and it blows back on them when the computer breaks in the distant future. This is largely because the IT person didn’t charge said friend or family member for their services.

In grandma’s eyes, your tech support service were free, so it has no value. You can’t be trusted as a real IT person, because your services are free. Charging a small “friends and family discount” type of thing actually cements in their mind that you do this for a living. You literally do this professionally. Even if you’re only charging them $5 for an hour of work, when you normally get paid $50 per hour. Again, you can call it the friends and family discount if you need to. But by charging them something, all of those “you broke my computer” complaints suddenly dry up. Because now you’re not just the grandson who plays with computers; you’re a professional in a specialized trade. You know what you’re doing, so it couldn’t have been your fault that the computer broke. It’s not really a friends and family discount; it’s a “stop blaming me when you download viruses” fee.

load more comments (1 replies)

Nice. Anyone who takes money from Adobe is a hero to me.

Inkscape is goated and so is Martin, respect 🫡

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 88 points 17 hours ago (17 children)

I am a Corel kind of bird myself, having used it both professionally (which is how I got started with it) and at home for a couple of decades now. I will say two things about that:

In its current version Inkscape is roughly on par with were CorelDraw was in its 4.0 state or thereabouts (which I still have a copy of, on like seventeen 3.5" floppy disks!) which sounds like damning with faint praise but it really isn't considering that Inkscape costs nothing to use.

However, one factor that I think most people don't think about is that Inkscape is currently the best software I've ever used, bar none, for ripping apart .pdf documents made by other software, for the purposes of monkeying with their contents. And that's a ten story tall flaming middle finger to Adobe, and completely obviates the need for 99.9999999% of all users to ever have to pay for the "pro" version of Adobe Acrobat or whatever they're calling it this week just to be able to made minor adjustments to a .pdf.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Have you tried LibreOffice Draw? I love it for that same reason.

I have, but in general I find Inkscape to be superior overall. The last time I tried the LibreOffice component it did not handle multiple pages very well.

[–] kaklerbitmap@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

I fucking loved Corel, I've never really found an adequate replacement for it. Guess I'll be giving InkScape a try, thanks

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I had no idea Inkscape could work with PDFs like that. Thank you!

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

I've always used LibreOffice for that purpose. It's more familiar if you're used to office software vs graphics design software.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 7 points 11 hours ago

I urge you to watch his update videos, he's such a neat guy, and he rocks a ska/dandy style

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 9 points 12 hours ago

I don't use Inkscape, but that is a good hat.

Open source software does not cause a loss of $ it causes everyone else gain.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not all heroes wear capes.

[–] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

Some wear bowler hats

[–] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 13 hours ago

Inkscape user here. Thanks Martin!

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 29 points 17 hours ago

Inkscape is one of my favorite applications out there. I use it almost daily, both for my day job and hobbies. Thanks Martin!

[–] sxan@midwest.social 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Inkscape is a pleasure to use; as powerful as you need, and you can use it with almost no learning curve and add power features as you need them. It's a wonderfully designed program with a well-thought out UX.

Gimp really could learn a lot about UX design from Inkscape. As much as I like Gimp, while uncommon things are possible but hard, simple things are also possible but hard.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This is the truth, right here. GIMP's user interface is an entire F5 tornado's worth of bullshit and it always has been. I always put it forth as the poster child of precisely how not to do it with any open source productivity software of any stripe and it's consistently never failed to serve as an example for nigh-on decades.

If the GIMP people would just suck it up and broadly copy the layout of... well, pretty much anything, even MS Paint, it'd be a massive improvement to usability and would probably confer a tenfold increase to the number of users willing to try it out. Or at least stick with it for more than five minutes.

I'm sure it's a perfectly capable program that's able to do many things. I just can't be bothered to put up with it. And this is coming from somebody who willingly uses FreeCAD.

Somehow in the transition from the bunch-of-disparate-floating-toolbar-windows paradigm to the current all-in-one design they've managed to make it slightly worse. GIMP's feature discoverability is basically nonexistent, and the uninitated have no hope of figuring out how to do anything with it other than doodle with the preset brushes without resorting to tutorials.

I can't believe the dockers ("dockable dialogs") still take up so much space yet somehow there isn't room to put title bars on them describing what they do even when you have one of them open and not just tabbed with an inscrutable icon at the top, nor is there any discoverable way to dismiss any of them once you're done with them because that option is buried in a flyout menu for some reason.

I could go on forever. Don't get me started.

I am a FOSS nerd for sure but GIMP sucks and it's awful. I'd rather individually plink pixels into a bitmap manually from the command line with Imagemagick than use GIMP.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›