this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

3620 readers
85 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

Qualcom right now:

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hasn't Huawei done this for ages? And Samsung attempted the same? I mean, it's still news, it just feels weird that the Pixels are pointed out of all things, even when ignoring Apple.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I guess because Google's Tensor chips are just more recent than Exynos. The Apple A4 was 15 years ago, and Samsung has been struggling to keep up with their Exynos chips for 14 years.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Samsung has been making their own CPUs (while also buying from 3rd parties) for decades. iPhones used to have Samsung CPUs.