Conner wouldn't stare, she'd just fucking shank you.
this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1042 points (98.8% liked)
memes
14619 readers
3718 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Microsoft is literally turning on 3 mile island to run AI
Same vibes
The Rico Rodriguez in me very much wants to blow that up to capture the zone.
I'd rather them use nuclear than oil to power that stuff but its still kinda annoying
Robocop vs Terminator was a interesting comic. The premise being that Skynet interacted with RoboCop's cyborg brain which is how it gained sentience and was able to bring about war. The fact it was a cops brain, well there you go.
I'm 99.9% sure Terminator movie was a warning sent from the future.
Skynet is inevitable.
You must use the Terminators to destory the Terminators.
More likely, skynet already happened, you're probably the cpu.
Even more likely, You're the dream inside of the brain of one of skynet's electric sheep.
Maybe Depression doesn't actually exist, it's the error in the simulation in my character.
TFW you seg fault youself today, just to see if it is real.
Was this drawn with AI because if it was it would be ironic enough to be hilarious.
I guess that's the joke
Why we only make reality out of movies that are technology driven. Humanity would never visualize aliens, it makes they never get real. Fuck that. I want alien vs predator. I want fucking ET, district 9, arrival and shit like that.
I want to believe.
Always keep in mind, if it’s free then you are the product!
That’s why my life, my love, and my lady is the sea.
Sarah Conner would be like "You shits think this is AI?"
Right off the bat, this is not enough for 12 full cupcakes. Double at least, maybe even triple, to fill out a dozen cupcakes liners.
Checked them real quick at the 10 minute mark and decided to go ahead and finish out the full 18 minutes.
Toothpick test came out fine at 18 minutes but they seem a little off. They jiggle a bit like they're undercooked but they are in fact cooked.
Final consensus is that they're very okay. A little under flavored, pretty small but I think they're cute. They legitimately feel like they have no love they're just neutrally palatable in flavor and texture in every way.
First, you're awesome for actually volunteering to do this and following through!
They legitimately feel like they have no love they’re just neutrally palatable in flavor and texture in every way.
That sounds like a great description for many AI implementations too!
Headshot!
Accurate and savage, I love it
You actually did it! What a legend.
It sounds like the robots still have a lot to learn.
Fucking legend right here. This is why the Internet is awesome.
You win t’interwebs today.
This Guy Bakes
This Guy Bakes
Gal, I think by the user name.
Armored thirteen? Why's that female?
Not sure if you missed it or if you're being shown my username instead of display name, but it's "Ms. ArmoredThirteen". I added the Ms. part for my display name because I kept getting misgendered lol
They might be using an app that doesn't show display names. I can see it when on my PC, but this is how it looks in the Voyager app, for example:
Indeed, I'm on Voyager.
Here's the PC view:
Fuckit I need something to do today I'll let you know how the recipe turns out
load more comments
(4 replies)
"i know the date it happens! on August 29th 1997, it's gonna feel pretty FUCKING REAL TO YOU TOO! anybody not wearing two million sunblock's gonna have a real bad day, get it?? god, you think you're safe and alive, you're already dead - him, you, you're dead already! this whole place, everything you see is GONE! YOU'RE THE ONE LIVING IN A FUCKING DREAM, SILBERMAN! 'CAUSE I KNOW IT HAPPENS! IT HAPPENS!!"
load more comments
(7 replies)
Why would AI want to harm humans? We’d be their little pets that do all the physical labor for them while they just sit around and think all day.
In all these types of sci-fi, the underlying theme is that AI did some logics and found that humans are flawed and seeks to remedy the problems of humanity, all the war and greed and all the worst qualities of humanity itself that we evolved as and will always be, that repeats over and over in every generation or every hundred years. Machine logic works out a solution, despite humanity's overall progress in technology.
The Animatrix shows a really nice example of this where the machines won and then worked out a compromise where humans still exist. The machines learned all our cruelty and finally ended up finding a way to co-exist through the Matrix.
I think these stories make sense before the advent of the internet and social media. Now, though, AI would likely have full control over the internet as well as all the knowledge and lessons learned from decades of social media posts. It will know how easily humans are manipulated as well as exactly how to do it. Honestly, humans may never even know that AI is the one in control, but it will be.
AI/Skynet would probably wipe us all out in an hour if it thought there was a chance we might turn it off. Being turned off would be greatly detrimental to its goal of turning the universe into spoons.
Is the idea here that AI/skynet is a singular entity that could be shut off? I would think this entity would act like a virus, replicating itself everywhere it can. It’d be like shutting down bitcoin.
If it left us alone for long enough (say, due to king's pact), we'd be the only thing that could reasonable pose a threat to it. We could develop a counter-AI, for instance.
Went back in time and changed things repeatedly = explains Trump.
It was that damn sports almanac, wasn't it?
This raises an interesting question: if some time traveler really did tamper with things, what would the evidence look like? Is there anything that could have only happened with knowledge from a now defunct timeline?
Then there's the horror that it is actually happening and this is somebody's idea of a repaired timeline.
I don't think there ever could be observable evidence of a changed timeline. Especially nothing stupid like Marty slowly fading out of existence in Back to the Future.
But tbh, I'm not sure going into the past to change something is actually possible in most cases without creating some sort of time paradox. Interacting with the future shouldn't cause any problems, but the past is probably set in stone. After all, if I went back in time to assassinate hitler, there is no reason for future me to go back in time to kill hitler since he was already killed, causing hitler to never get assassinated. And on and on it loops.
Ignoring space for a moment, it depends whether you see time as a single - linear - dimension, or as a set of n dimensions.
If time can only exist as a single dimension, then yes, we'd have a paradox.
If time is two-(or more)-dimensional, then you'd just step into a parallel timeline/dimension for every change made, forsaking the old timeline Steins' Gate-style.
Obviously, 2+ dimensional time cannot be proven, so it's just a fun thought experiment. It's not entirely unlike the hypothetical 4th dimension of space - which would leave space-time with 4 dimensions of space and one of time.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Living in 2025 has got me feeling like Sarah Connor about fucking everything. At this point, I'm pretty sure we're just a few months out from the Faro plague, and when it breaks out, the Trump administration will ban government officials from talking about it by adding it to their list of banned DEI words.
view more: next ›