this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
676 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

69850 readers
3098 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla has confirmed it has given up on plans to make a Cybertruck range extender to achieve the range it originally promised on the electric pickup truck.

It started refunding deposits for the $16,000 extra battery pack.

When Tesla unveiled the production version of the Cybertruck in late 2023, two main disappointments were the price and the range.

The tri-motor version, the most popular in reservation tallies before production, was supposed to have over 500 miles of range and start at $70,000.

Tesla now sells the tri-motor Cybertruck for $100,000 and only has a range of 320 miles.

The dual-motor Cybertruck was supposed to cost $50,000 and have over 300 miles of range. In reality, it starts at $80,000 and has 325 miles of range.

Archive link: https://archive.is/CGbaE

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Longer range so it can get stuck further from home? 🤭😀👍

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

It could be $15 and have the range of an ICBM, it can still sit on the lot and scare the kids walking by.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 38 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (8 children)

Is it just me, or is musk profiting off of selling people tech before it's actually ready?

Like, we don't have the means right now to achieve what he advertises, so he lies about it and then 'alters the deal' after taking people's money.

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

Oh he’s been called out for that for over a decade now, it just got buried under the mass of starry eyed reporting.

[–] LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

that's been tech as an industry for the last decade. product releases, then all promised features come as a half baked update a year later... if at all. phones, games, cars, etc all use this strategy now unfortunately.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

selling half-assed tech, basically A scam, which is whole business model.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 16 hours ago

Only a fool buys something on the promise of future upgrades and potential. Buy stuff on what it is now.

This is a bad look for Tesla for sure, but no one should be going “I wouldn’t have bought it if I knew this would get cancelled”.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 22 points 22 hours ago

That's exactly what he's been doing with all his businesses. And it works. Tesla is still hugely overvalued as a company.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 6 points 17 hours ago

Is it just me, or is musk profiting off of selling people tech before it's actually ready?

Today's vocab word is Vaporware

[–] Azal@pawb.social 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So he learned from the video gaming industry?

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yep.

"Games as a service" are released as a "minimum viable product" to see if it can hook enough suckers to make it profitable enough for the company to finish making.

If there aren't enough saps that take the bait, development ceases and whoever put their faith in the product look like tools.

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Pray I don't alter it further.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about giving up on the Cybertruck

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

Why the switch to a black hat? Was it to easy for people to see?

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 157 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (5 children)

"Thanks for all the $16k loans at 0% shmucks. We've kept the interest we made while rates have been up and now you can have it back while they're dropping. Of course, your money is now worth less than it was when you gave it to us during high inflation. Suck it losers. Love, T E S L A"

EDIT: deposit was $150. Still shitty but not the same impact

EDIT 2: Or $2000? ... tl;dr: shitty

[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The deposit for a cyberstuck was $150. The package was valued at $16k.

Being happy about lies being exposed is good, but spreading a false narrative about it is bad.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

The dual motor was originally announced to be US$39,900, not 50,000. It is lies all the way down at Tesla.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Tesla is not the only one guilty of this, unfortunately. It seems to be standard practice in the industry now.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Ima be honest, I like the design of this thing. I’m big into brutalism and the Delorean is one of my favorite car designs of all time. I was really hoping this would be good, but it has turned out to be one of the worst products in recent history in any category. It’s up there with the humane pin.

It makes me a little bit sad because I will never be able to live out my cyberpunk fantasy of driving an electric truck made out of bare metal manufactured by a technofascist corporation.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 4 points 15 hours ago

I don't know man, the hyundai ioniq 5 has way more delorean vibes than the cyber truck. The cyber truck just actually looks like how i was drawing cars as a child.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 5 points 22 hours ago

I absolutely hated the design and feel bad for anyone who gets into an accident with this monstrosity.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 108 points 1 day ago (4 children)

However, Tesla had devised a solution to bring the range closer to what it originally announced: a separate battery pack that sits in the truck’s bed. Tesla called it a “range extender.” It costs $16,000 and takes up a third of the Cybertruck’s bed.

You cannot make this shit up 😂

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mle86@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How hard can it be to produce a simple battery pack, for a company that is in the business of designing and producing battery packs no less...

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Think the end of the article pretty much nails it.

Tesla needed to install and remove it at a service center. Owners couldn’t remove them themselves. I think it was pretty much dead on arrival at $16,000.

But I think it could also be as simple as it’s not worth producing due to demand – both due to insufficient people reserving it and not enough Cybertruck buyers to create a market for the range extender.

Therefore, the range extender is dead for the same reason that the Cybertruck RWD now has the same battery pack as the AWD instead of a smaller pack for less money: the Cybertruck is a commercial flop, and it’s not a high-volume program enough to justify making several battery pack sizes, including a removable one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 16 hours ago

Preorder interest probably made it not worth it financially.

load more comments
view more: next ›