Sunak doesn't understand why people don't just fly over the traffic in their helicopters. Stupid lazy ground people.
I could see it happening, though I suspect that it'd probably require getting the pilot out of the equation to bring costs down. Like, use short-range hops using electric aircraft to yank people out of London to transport areas outside.
You put something like this in London.
An animation on Joby's website shows one such journey, from a heliport in downtown Manhattan to John F. Kennedy International Airport, completed in seven minutes (as opposed to 49 minutes by car).
Joby founder and CEO JoeBen Bevirt told the Washington Post in 2021 the company hopes to begin services at an average price of around $3 per mile — comparable to that of an taxi or Uber — and eventually move that down to below $1 per mile.
"Our goal is to actually be competitive with the cost of ground transportation, but to deliver you to your destination ... five times faster and with a dramatically better experience," Bevirt told Bloomberg TV on Wednesday.
Convert it to a UAV, so now you don't need the pilot. And then it just blips back and forth to the outskirts, linking to parking lots/airports/train stations/whatever.
It's not as energy-efficient as a ground vehicle, but electricity is also cheaper than fuel, and we've found automating aerial vehicles to be a lot easier than ground vehicles.
If you can stack things vertically and use a computer to control stuff, you can get a lot of density; your constraint on throughput is probably your landing space in the city.
I love this idea. If these were to be made available in London, the lines would be endless.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Rishi Sunak's cuts to HS2 will leave more motorists sitting in traffic jams as companies abandon plans to shift freight from lorries on to rail, transport bosses have warned.
After that part of the project was scrapped, the prime minister was accused of a "senseless and counterproductive" U-turn –and warned his policy would lead to "major backlogs on our already congested roads".
The warning shot comes after Mr Sunak unveiled a "plan for drivers" and reallocated billions from the HS2 budget to road upgrades in a bid to cast himself as the friend of the motorist.
Without this vital additional capacity, plans to improve the UK’s freight and passenger services will be restricted," said Alex Veitch, director of policy and insights at the British Chambers of Commerce.
"Each train that HS2’s capacity would have unlocked had the potential to remove up to 129 lorries from the road, this will also be a lost opportunity to build a low-carbon freight transport system.
Wera Hobhouse, the Liberal Democrats' transport spokesperson, said: “This is yet another broken promise from Rishi Sunak, which will end up causing major backlogs on our already congested roads and railway lines.”
The original article contains 726 words, the summary contains 193 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Those motorists who voted for Brexit can console themselves with the knowledge that the smug liberal elites who would otherwise be breezing past them on a high-speed train are stuck in the same traffic jam, breathing in the same diesel fumes.
Brexit hasn't done us any favours, but I don't really see what it has to do directly with the scrappage of HS2 phase 2?
And anyone that isn't a "smug liberal elite" and also can't drive for whatever reason, is either sat on the floor next to the toilet on a packed cross country service, or just staying at home because it's too expensive to travel.
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.