this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
18 points (87.5% liked)

Canada

9641 readers
830 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Get naked, the way nature intended.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nudists solved this problem long ago!

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Seriously, why are people so shocked by naked bodies?

Ever been to a nudist beach? It's awesome.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is likely because, right from the beginning, we're taught to directly correlate nudity with sexuality — this is not easy to solve, for the majority of people.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ever been to a nudist beach? It's awesome.

I have and it is!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Non-paywall original article: https://apnews.com/article/earth-day-clothing-synthetic-fibers-microfibers-microplastics-7ba38acebdb1ab73a6580f3196279553

I have to say, I'm pretty skeptical about the non-filter solutions here. Fibres are small. I don't think a net bag or plastic doohicky will catch many, unless someone can scientifically prove otherwise.

[–] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Even if the solution did work, now you have a doohicky full of microplastics. You can't throw it out because that puts you at square one. Are we shoving it in the walls like razor blades in the 70s and hoping for a solution in the future?

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

Being buried in a landfill would be better than in the water supply.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Would the co2 released from burning it be better or worse than the micro plastics?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, right? Microplastics don't cause any global warming, they're just a direct health risk to people and to wildlife, to some poorly-understood degree.

You really have to weigh one crisis against another, logically speaking. Unfortunately, it all gets jammed into "environmentalism" as one amorphous mass.