this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
406 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

69109 readers
2245 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 113 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Let me know when we actually execute monopoly regulations as intended.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 100 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They “trust” me.

Dumb fucks.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They "trust" me.

Dumb fucks.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 5 days ago

They “trust” me.

Dumb fucks.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 62 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That IS A Smoking Gun yes! But have They CONSIDERED that with Another couple MILLION Dollars in Donations to our Non Corrupt President the Trial can Go Away?

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 13 points 6 days ago

As far as I can tell, the promise of a substantial donation seems all that's required, that and genuflecting .. pro tip, don't mention the hands.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Just gotta Zuck that felonious toadstool

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Meta argued that "the FTC’s case rests almost entirely on emails (many more than a decade old) allegedly expressing competitive concerns" but suggested that this is only "intent" evidence, "without any evidence of anticompetitive effects."

Not sure I understand the argument. if I write that I'm going to buy another company instead of competing with them, then I go ahead and I do buy that exact company, are they arguing that the two things are not necessarily related?

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes. The argument is, raise the burden of proof: you are proving what my intent was, and what actions I took, but you should be proving negative market effects. Just because I said it, and I did it, doesn’t mean I succeeded. And if I didn’t there’s no reason to be broken up.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Thanks, I understand better now.

On a related note, I wish I had known of the "just because I said it and I did it, doesn't mean I succeeded" line of defense when I was a kid

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Haha! Yes, but not sure how effective it would have been. I think parenting counts intent way above outcomes.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"Attempted murder? What next? The Nobel prize in attempted physics?"

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have doubts it will get fully prosecuted under this administration. Tech oligarchy have been sucking Trump’s dick since he started his term.

Zuckerfuck being among the worst in the bunch.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 5 days ago

Any coincidence that 2012 e-mails are finally coming to trial today?

[–] 0p3r470r@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I am honestly surprised President dum dum, or the AG hasn’t shut down this investigation yet

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

There are still "favors" to be done.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Didn't Musk and Zuck want to literally fight recently? I don't think they are friends.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

It was all a theatre, I'm pretty sure.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

That's when zucks first android robot model came out