this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
727 points (98.9% liked)

politics

22757 readers
2901 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump snapped at a reporter who asked how much economic pain he was willing to inflict amid plunging markets triggered by his new tariffs.

Speaking after a weekend at his Florida resort, Trump dismissed speculation he was trying to crash the market, claiming tariffs would bring in "$1 trillion" and spur U.S. manufacturing.

When asked about a pain threshold for Americans, he called the question "so stupid," arguing economic “medicine” was necessary to reverse decades of "stupid leadership."

He insisted the strategy would make the U.S. "solid and strong again."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

It's amazing how confident the truly stupid are.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

....claiming tariffs would bring in “$1 trillion”

They've already LOST $11 trillion. What an utter imbecile!!

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So it'll just take 11 years to even out.

Edit: Just double checked, it's 1 trillion in the "next year or so". So x >= 11 years :(

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

tRump maths...lol.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In fairness to Trump, he has never, ever experienced the consequences of his actions. Bankrupt? Didn't put a dent in his life since his father and banks kept the money flowing to him regardless, more than once. Rapist? No jail time. Fraudster? No jail, not sure that any fines have even been paid. So why would he think, when nothing bad happens to him and he can still golf the weekend away, that anything bad will happen to all the people losing their jobs, their investments, their retirement, their homes? Why don't they all have rich fathers and sycophantic bankers to bail them out? At very least they should have Russian mafia backers like he does, that make it look like he's a billionaire, even if it really is billions in debt to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 2deck@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This rhetoric seems similar to that used by Milton Friedman and the Chicago school of economics. They applied 'economic therapy' to left-leaning economies in the late 1900s which involved rapid privatization of nationally owned industries. Negatively affected many otherwise healthy countries including England, Russia and Chilie.

The Shock Doctrine does a round robin of these events; highly recommended.

Project 2025 is about privatizing branches of government while citizens are too busy dealing with the fallout of economic collapse.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

They're seriously going to privatize the weather service and social security if we do not continue to take to the streets.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 days ago

Russia was not healthy when it applied shock therapy. The Soviet Union was collapsing, massive political instability in Moscow, all sorts of countries moving out of the Russian sphere of influence, the first Chechen war started and so forth. It was fairly obvious that big decision had to be made, but unfortunatly Russia choose poorly.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 99 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Everybody is thinking way, way too much into this.

If Trump would have to answer a question where he doesn't know the answer, or would have to admit that people disagree with him, or he feels even mildly challenged, this is considered a personal attack on him. You are trying to get him to admit to not being 100% perfect 100% of the time. And he responds to that by lashing out like a small child, attacking you, making up childish names for you, and insulting you. This is how he has always responded.

This has nothing to do with his thoughts on economic policies or the effects of his tariffs. He doesn't think far enough ahead to either know or care. This reporter had the audacity to challenge him, and Trump lashed out. That's all. That's how he always responds.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago

I can't understand how more people don't understand this. There's no depth to any of this. An immature, ignorant, narrow-minded idiot doing immature, ignorant, narrow-minded things. The media's sane washing is to blame, I guess, if not the straight propaganda from right wing outlets. But at this point if you're still giving the benefit of the doubt you're part of the problem.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

So true. You don't have to dig deep into any of his responses when you criticize anything about him. He will lash out. He's a child. That's it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He will tolerate none for himself.

The rest of us can get fucked. STFU about the price of eggs, right? He’s no longer president. He’s gone full dictator. This is all about him.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 day ago

It was always all about him. The election was the only way he was staying out of prison and the campaign was lie after lie after lie, telling his moron supporters what they wanted to hear, in order to secure their vote. He doesn't give a shit about those people once they've posted their ballot.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Americans circa 2025 about to take their economic medicine

load more comments (1 replies)

Even if his tariffs do bring in $1 trillion, that's not even half the loss his tariffs have cause in just 3 days.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 154 points 2 days ago

Well, it is a stupid question. A real journalist would ask how much more pain he's willing to let the American people tolerate for his poorly disguised reverse pump and dump scheme

[–] mapmyhike@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tRump always speaks in a clear, concise, fact based, evidence based, and in a verifiable manner. He uses proof such as "medicine," "stupid," "someone said," "I heard," "everyone is saying." "Economic medicine," what is that?

[–] CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely, and what I like best about him is his trustworthiness and respect for women.

[–] Lunar_Voyager@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

He's also a genius businessman who will run our country like his businesses, which will be great and lead to widespread prosperity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 106 points 2 days ago (6 children)

His motives may be unclear, but his actions are crystal clear. He’s tried to enact tariffs already and been stopped before they were implemented because everyone knows the level of damage they cause. He’s moving forward this time. He’s deliberately crashing the global economy.

Why? Who knows? His Silicon Valley overlords demand it? I doubt it’s Putin, because Russia’s economy is hanging on by a thread, and the last thing they need is a global downturn, especially when it craters oil prices. Is it just that Trump is stupid, maybe senile, and ultimately in charge?

Regardless, the leader of the biggest economy in the world has decided that it’s time for a global recession/depression, so unless that course is changed, that’s probably what’s going to happen.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

His motives are always crystal clear. Ego. He wants people to grovel and beg for exceptions. He wants to feel powerful. The fact that mainstream news won't say so is likely predicted on not wanting to be banned from the press pool like the AP was.

The government and media have a mutually parasitic relationship. The government uses the media to spread and reinforce their propaganda, while the media's jobs are made much easier by having direct and ostensibly willing access to the people in government. If they want access, the media has to play ball. The rules seem to be unwritten, like their own little interwoven social contract. The result being that they've mostly become pushovers when some Orange Jackass comes along to play dictator and burn the country to the ground in pursuit of his own aggrandizement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's all plans from the '30s. Canada, the US, Mexico, Greenland, dismantling democracy to install technocrats, crashing the economy to bring back company towns - none of it is new, it's just being implemented in a nonsensical and incompetent way, so it seems random

It's not a good plan to start with, but there is a plan... One the oligarchs bought into, but without understanding how the plan was meant to be enacted

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

"sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something"

Exactly, medicine exists to fix something. What Trump is doing is substance abuse.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

... Even... if Trump... can bring in $1 trillion... somehow...

US stock markets have wiped out $ 9 trillion in market cap since Trump became President.

.... So uh. Yeah.

1 - 9 is -8, Don.

Great plan.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That $1 trillion he's claiming also comes from the pockets of Americans, so it's more like - 1 - 9 = - 10.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (21 children)

I am trying to give him a delusional level of benefit of thr doubt in thinking that some fucking how these tariffs actually result in 1 trillion in new US manufacturing industries/investments.

Even by his own... """"logic"""" ... his plan makes no fucking sense.

Of course yes, in reality... it makes even less sense, because you don't get new manufacturing in a very high cost of living country without extremely well thought out industrial policy, subsidies, ways to attract needed talent, and investment, and ... you get it.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 43 points 2 days ago (9 children)

The only way I see the US becoming "solid and strong again", is a revolution that results in a Constitution v2.0 that fixes many issues with the structure of government, voting, and setting rules regarding wealth. Otherwise, odds are that the US will splinter apart into several major bodies.

On the plus side of splintering, it means many conservatives would flee out of Blue States, and the Blue States get more people who believe in governance, science, democracy, and society. They would be far more stronger and influential than Red States in the long run. Blue States won't have to play ball with stupid conservative ideas, such as non-medical vaccine exemptions, anti-migrant policies, and so forth.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At least one revolution is already underway, but those responsible for the current change are wearing red hats. The neo-reactionary Butterfly Revolution.

Unfortunately, most Democratic Party politicians today are the real conservatives in the sense that they simply want to preserve the old system.

And there are people who identify as Democrats but are increasingly disillusioned, who want reform or revolution in the direction of a egalitarian, democratic society with strong social welfare systems geared toward equity (let’s hope they grow in number), not in the direction of the elitist, authoritarian, technofeudalist, rigid hierarchical society proposed by adherents of the Dark Enlightenment ideas. Such people could redirect the current Butterfly Revolution in the opposite direction and foment division among Republicans.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

he's totally ok that every vulnerable has to eat leather boots to make it through a depression.

"libs were pwned"

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Donald doesn't have to tolerate any pain. He's a billionaire. Billionaire's way of life will still be unbelievably fabulous. It's us that suffer at their expense.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's a billionaire.

Allegedly. His inability to pay some of the judgments against him calls that into question, e.g. the E. Jean Carrol suit. If nothing else, he definitely has a billionaire mindset.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Trump Media and the Trumpcoin crypto scam have, sadly, probably put his net worth back up high enough for him to actually be able to truthfully call himself a billionaire again. He just doesn't pay his court judgements because what are they gonna do about it if he doesn't? Take him to court again? His whole strategy is to make plaintiffs go broke trying to collect from him, which is why he has it out for all the law firms working pro bono against him right now.

[–] BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Wanna ask Trump if he'll still be alive by the time American manufacturing makes his tariffs pay off

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can we just elect Camacho? He's more qualified than whatever the fuck we got now

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

No can do, Camacho was black. And we can't have another black president. /s

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Economic Medicine? This shit must have been economics course at the fucking failed Trump University.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

its called a word salad, and the WEAVE.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Trump will endure precisely zero economic pain since he is rich. He doesn't have to go through anything. He sits in a literal ivory tower why would he feel bad about anything?

[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Stupid questions for stupid people.

[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump bankrupted a casino, is anyone surprised he's doing the same to America.

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wrong. WRONG!
It was more than one casino.

1991: Trump Taj Mahal
1992: Trump Castle Hotel & Casino
1992: Trump Plaza Casino
1992: Trump Plaza Hotel (not a casino, 'just' a hotel.)
2004: Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts
2009: Trump Entertainment Resorts (casino holding company)

There are numerous other businesses that failed spectacularly, too.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Then there are the failed businesses that were neverbsupposed to succeed because they were fraud from the inception, like Trump University. They announced it and promoted it, and signed up students, who took out student loans ffrom the government and sent them to thebadmissions department.

Then it turned out that they never bought/ rented a single building, hired no teachers, never created a curriculum, etc. They didn't do one thing to create a school except sign up students and take their student loan money. It didn't go bankrupt, it never existed, but they sold it anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't get it. If your position is that a temporary downturn is necessary then the question seems very sensible. And somehow Trump says it is necessary but asking about the maximum extent he'd go for is very stupid?

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's not supposed to be temporary. They want to destroy the economy. They want to destroy the entire system that FDR started. They want to tear down the US and their Western allies, that's their true goal, and create something like Praxis in its place, a supposed libertarian paradise where every city and piece of land is controlled by a Corporation that has judicial and executive power over one territory, a fiefdom.

It's technofeudalism, a form of facism,

https://www.praxisnation.com/

https://theplotagainstamerica.com/

https://time.com/6092844/peter-thiel-power-biography-the-contrarian/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-feudalism

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technofeudalism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Land

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment

https://youtu.be/5RpPTRcz1no

This also ties with Greenland,

https://gizmodo.com/peter-thiel-backed-startup-that-wanted-to-buy-greenland-is-thrilled-that-trump-wants-to-buy-greenland-2000548415

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/01/16/spiritual-case-greenland-trump-00198848

The Heritage Foundation, famous for Project 25, has its interests aligned with the technofeudalists because this measure will give enormous power to the Churches, which in essence are nothing more than Corporations too.

Opus Dei is one of the groups behind the Heritage Foundation's Project 25, whose current president is Kevin Roberts, who has an extensive history of involvement with American Catholic organizations.

Here you can see Kevin Roberts speech at CIC (Opus Dei Headquarters on K Street, Washington DC) last year,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqgfhZpRZhg

Peter Thiel himself has connections to the Opus Dei,

https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/the-final-conversations-of-a-dying-priest

https://www.project2025.observer/

And if you, my reader, still think this will be good for your small or medium-sized business. Remember. In a world where Corporations are Kingdoms, new entrepreneurs are separatists. They will be crushed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›