this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
467 points (99.2% liked)

Canada

9424 readers
1625 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

CBC has English coverage, and the law is only described as a "trade irritant", not anything illegal, which is surprising given the insane claims the Trump admin likes to make:

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative released its annual list of global trade barriers Tuesday, and it includes Quebec's controversial language law Bill 96 as a trade irritant between the two countries.

The law isn't new but it has provisions that kick in in June that seem to be the main issue:

The changes impact the use of French in the judicial system, health care, schools, workplaces and businesses across the provincial economy, but the issue singled out as a trade barrier by the U.S. is how it impacts trademarks and labelling.

"U.S. businesses have expressed concerns about the impact that Bill 96 will have on their federally registered trademarks for products manufactured after June 1, 2025, which is when the relevant provisions of Bill 96 enter into force," the National Trade Estimate Report said.

When the new provisions kick in this summer, trademarks displayed on a product can only appear in English if there's no French version of the trademark registered. If the trademark or label contains generic terms or descriptions that are not in French, the trademark must be changed to include a French version of those terms and descriptions.

Companies found to have violated these changes to the law can face fines of up to $90,000 per day for their third offence, while individuals can be fined up to $42,000 a day for their third offence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago

Oh ho ho..... you've pissed off Quebec now. Gods help you now USA. :p

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wait till they learn about other languages in other countries.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

They're crushing Spanish in their own country.

The US conquered land from Mexico some centuries ago, and thus there's a large population of monolingual Spanish speakers in the south of the country.

Carney has said the same.

PP, of course, is willing to talk about it.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 10 points 6 days ago

In that case I don't see why they'd object to it, their president seems to be all in favour of illegal trade barriers.

[–] ellypony@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Awwwww : ( pleurer plus 💔

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Speaking your own language is an affront to American business. Better clean up your act Frenchie.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›