this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
140 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

54155 readers
377 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Chatham Islands ?

I chose Tasmania, am here now.. I dont think anywhere is but i am hoping it's lesser and i am not the literal tip of the spear.

Albiet the poulation is older, white, conservative, religious so there is that problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (29 children)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Somewhere I won't be bothered, like Tristan da Cunha or the Pitcairn Islands

[–] TheGuyTM3@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Marquesas islands. They are very large, no dangers, lot of hideouts, lot of food resources, innaccessible for wheel vehicles, almost impossible to build large bases and to urbanise (small interest for China), they are isolated from other archipelagos, and the islands have not even 10k inhabitants in total (14 islands) so no one would get interest in nuking here.

load more comments (1 replies)

We will know the best place after whatever event happens. It’s always hard to predict these things with so many variables.

Exactly where I am.

I moved to a backwater town in the middle of the desert for a fucking reason, worse comes to worst and I've got the benefit of being able to travel in literally any direction and be on res.

[–] whelk@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Why should I leave? They're the ones who suck. I'm not giving any ground

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

if teleportation is allowed, i would just telefrag putin in moscow.

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Nomadic life makes the most sense, just figure out your mode(s) of transportation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve got a bug out zone extremely close to a bordering country that’s self sufficient. Staying put unless things get wildly out of hand. We could probably house another 2 families if needed.

Can I call dibs?

Somewhere obscure in the U.K. I’d rather struggle to survive there rather than as cannon fodder for some rich scum.

[–] Tinks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PopeyesBiscuit@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Think my home country Suriname is pretty safe. Almost no one knows it exists and there's plenty of places to ride out instability

[–] edel@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we take its actual definition; far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist, countries like Cuba for sure fits the bill. Now Cuba is authoritarian (and normal since they are in permanent and genuine threat from its neighbor) and probably that is not what is in your mind. Latin America is, as many as you pointed out, no ideal... but most countries there at least lacks of a strong government to enforce things (for better or worse) so, in a turbulent world, it is indeed a better bet. I think, for the time being, Spain has proven to be resilient to authoritarianism and even the voters of "extreme" parties are not that extreme themselves! In Latin America, Mexico is proven to have an amazing leadership (today, I consider it the best worldwide) so unlikely to change overnight. Colombia, Chile and Uruguay seems promising too.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am going to timetravel to the 1890s

[–] elric@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The dream of the 1890s is alive in Portland

[–] rivan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's the dysentery, isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Outer space

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί