158
submitted 1 year ago by Bebo@literature.cafe to c/science@beehaw.org

A Babylonian tablet from around 1770 BC uses principles of the Pythagorean theorem, suggesting ancient Babylonians discovered it centuries before the famous Greek mathematician Pythagoras for whom it's named.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 55 points 1 year ago

Basically nothing survived the millennia. The fact that so many Greek philosophers are known probably has more to do with the Greek->Roman->Medieval->Modern preservation chain than any special brilliance of the Greeks.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago

Yep. History is written by the victors. And Western textbooks are full of Greek names. But when it comes to Eastern contributions..? Eh, let’s just call it the “Chinese Remainder Theorem”. They don’t get names.

It paints a real strange picture.

[-] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 4 points 1 year ago

In France most curricula go one step further and call it "the Chinese theorem". Talk about internalised racism.

[-] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Internalized? I dont think you are using that correctly.

[-] renard_roux@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Institutionalized maybe?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Anything not preserved on stone or metal will be lost eventually.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Well, copying extends important things a bit; I don't think there's any original Aristotle copies. It's really easy now, so last time someone asked about future preservation on AskHistorians the experts were pretty positive on the outlook.

You can buy stone-like optical disks that should last forever once burned, if you want to make a time capsule.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's not the fact that A^2 + B^2 = C^2 that's important, it's the proof

there's been evidence for ages that previous civilizations used it

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Even his role regarding the proof seems unclear. It was interesting to browse the Wiki articles about this theorem's history. Could be him, or one of his students, or neither.

[-] Haus@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I’m so excited for the next round of thread. Who will proof of Pythagorean theorem fight this time?

[-] koreth@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

The paper (linked from the article) has a photo of the actual tablet in question, which was apparently discovered circa 1900.

[-] ikanreed@mastodon.social 5 points 1 year ago

@Bebo There's been evidence for a long time that pythagoras was more cult-leader than mathematician, and his cult falsely attributed lots of things to him.

[-] Bebo@literature.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

I actually remember watching a video about this on youtube, that Pythagoras was a sort of cult leader more than anything. So I found it quite interesting when I came across this article about the Babylonian tablet.

[-] iMastari@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Pythagoras: "I made this."

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
158 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13000 readers
4 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS