this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
1862 points (93.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

7223 readers
1610 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

I think people who call Republicans and Democrats the same are just in love with their own need to rant. When they're elderly they'll walk around shouting at trees.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The far left and far right are both bad. If in doubt, look at any country which has gone down either path.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Who killed more Soviets? The far-right, or the far-left?

I’ll just take a pass on the far-anythings.

(Anyone who tries to paint this as pro Trump needs to reread it)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 163 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Americans are so far to the right that minimum wage, affordable housing, free schools and healthcare is considered "far left". These are given and common sense in the rest of the world 🤣

[–] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In developed countries*

I'm not sure if the USA qualifies for that status

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Even in developing countries, governments do their best to provide free services for those in dire poverty, especially those considered "poorest of the poor".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 120 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The more... favorable right wing points I've heard are more along the lines of "I've busted my ass for what little I have! How dare you ask me to pay to subsidize the lives of people who aren't trying to work?"

Completly ignoring the fact that better welfare programs should help them to not have to work so damn hard for so little in the first place. Or the fact that the welfare cliff and other various systemic problems make it that much harder to get out of that pit no matter how hard you're trying.

It's not even quite "fuck you, I got mine" because so many of them barely "got theirs" as is, which makes them even more protective. The ones that do have, have latched on to this idea of the entirely self made man, which ignores all the public welfare systems they used on their journey. Like schools, or roads. You can hardly exist in modern America without using multiple tax funded public works/welfare things every day.


Then you add in the hard spun rhetoric that taxes they already don't want being taken from them might be paying for things they personally disagree with and things get extra firey.


Meanwhile the richest people on earth have spent more money than is comprehendable on convincing people that going after rich peoples' money will just make everything more expensive for the normal folk.

But that would imply that they were currently leaving potential profits on the table. They're already charging absolutely as much as they can, and constantly trying to shift it higher. I'm sure they'd still fuck us on the way down, but we're never going to fix things unless we find some way to adequately tax the rich.

[–] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 78 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The "barely got mine and defending it" thing really sticks in other ways too.

When I wanted aid for school "sorry, we ran out. Should have gotten here earlier."

When I wanted to get food stamps "sorry, you don't meet the qualifications on a technicality."

When I finally got Medicaid but couldn't use it "not enough spots for you to be seen, sorry."

Many times the administrators that gave me this news implied it was because too many people asked for it. Being young and stupid (and let's face it, indoctrinated), it made me put the blame on the other people asking for aid. If there were less people that asked for aid, I wouldn't be starving and sick. I thought that I was more worthy of the aid because some people are cheating the system and I deeply resented them.

Fortunately I grew the hell up and pulled my head out of my ass. It's all a distraction we get fed from the news that other needy people are the reason why we suffer. It's so hard to fathom how much the rich actually waste when all we see is our fellow working class folk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 week ago (20 children)

Getting everyone's basic needs met is more of a centre-left ideology.
Many centre-right parties believe in things like public healthcare, because it has a net-benefit to the economy.

Centrists don't sit in the middle of every issue or make an exact 50/50 compromise on everything. That's a really poor strawman argument from someone who clearly doesn't understand global politics.

I guess you're confused with people in the U.S who think having views somewhere in-between those of democrats and republicans makes you a centrist.
That U.S-specific 'centrism' is really just right wing politics.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Meeting everyone's basic needs isn't even far left. This is how far the Overton window has shifted to the right. Meeting everyone's basic needs is left-of-centre. Far left would be state owned and controlled everything, redistribution of wealth via any means necessary, all public services fully state funded and free for all at the point of use.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lookupgeorgism@lemm.ee 46 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Centrism doesn't mean that you can't choose between democrats and republicans, it means that ideologically, you believe in a balance between capitalist ideas and socialist ideas. For example, you can believe in the Hayekian idea that the many interactions between individuals in the market is better at creating prosperity than a centralized government that distributes all goods and services. But you can also believe that the market can't do everything on its own due to market failures like monopoly power, externalities, assymmetric information. There exists a compromise between the two that is negotiated through politics. A core necessity for this to happen is that democracy is maintained. Democracy is not maintained when elections are bought by companies.

What is happening in the US now is that politics has been taken over by the private market. No economist would have agreed with this (unless they were paid to). It is against everything that we know. This is not a left vs right stance. It's a democracy vs autocracy stance. Autocracy can happen from both the right and left, and it doesn't matter who.

The one thing I dislike about the idea of centrism is the idea that you can't decide on everything because you remain agnostic about every issue. I think a much better idea to advocate for is pluralism: the idea that your opinion on specific issues is not dependent on your politcal stance. Every issue is unique and doesn't automatically identify you with left or right. You can have different opinions on different issues.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee -5 points 6 days ago (17 children)

I consider myself Centrist because I would rather eat 10 pounds of fried bugs than align myself with either absolute clown show of a party.

I'm a free agent, and the haters can't stand that they can't have me.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Valar_Morghulis@jlai.lu 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s funny because from my European perspective there’s no (visible) left in the USA. Democrats are centrist. Sanders could be social democrat. Otherwise I fully agree with you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 33 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That's not even far on the left, that's just some middle of the ground left. Real far left would be burning government buildings while having a heated discussion about the order of the colors for the flag to be raised over the rubble.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

Lol that's not the far left's position get the fuck out of here. The first paragraph is describing center/center-left.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›