this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
46 points (92.6% liked)

πŸ¦‹ Bluesky Social

222 readers
36 users here now

Bluesky is a federated social network built on ATProtocol.

Rules:

  1. Follow lemm.ee's site-wide rules.
  2. All posts must, in some way, relate to Bluesky or ATProto.
  3. Do not make duplicate posts.
  4. Do not post x.com links.

Useful Links:

News, discussion, and memes are all allowed here.

See also:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Phase one is to create a PDS that securely hosts data in Canada, away from political persecution of 2SLGBTQIA+.

Phase two and beyond will include our own AppView and improved moderation tools.

These networks will exist side by side with bluesky and allow interaction per usual. Source

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Don’t we already have Mastodon ?

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is for Bluesky users who still want to be on Bluesky, but don't want their data stored under US jurisdiction, or don't want to rely on Bluesky's moderation.

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

So even though blusky isn’t federated, the protocol still allows for using different domains to interact on the platform? I need to study how it works better.

Edit: stupid autocorrect

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

They actually do use the word "federated" to describe ATProto, but most people here understand that word to mean "ActivityPub," so I wouldn't. You can read more about it here.

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reminder: there is no such thing as a "Bluesky instance." The way ATProto works is nothing like the way ActivityPub works.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Then where are the accounts that are not on sky.social?

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The .bsky.social you often see at the end of Bluesky usernames is not like the @mastodon.social you often see at the end of Mastodon usernames.

On Bluesky, usernames have to be a domain. If you own your own domain, you can set your username to that domain, but if you don't, you'll usually be assigned one that ends in .bsky.social. In the following example, the New York Times sets their username to @nytimes.com, because they own nytimes.com.

.

Their data is still hosted on one of Bluesky's PDSs, however.

A PDS is just a server that personal data, a Personal Data Server. Currently, the process of moving ones data off of Bluesky's PDS and onto another is cumbersome, and the only users who have done so are technically inclined and self-hosting their own PDS. There are only about a thousand of them (according to the graph below), but hopefully there will be more once the process is streamlined.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Since my business owns a domain I could change my bsky.social or my business domain? Would that affect people following me?

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago

If your business owns a domain, you can set your handle to that domain. This blog post explains how to do so.

If you change your handle, users who follow you will still follow you. If you migrate to a different PDS, your followers will still follow you.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Speaking of hosting in Canada, I am surprised years ago why Blackberry having lost the hardware race didn't just provide an encrypted messager that ran on Apple and Android. They could have been 'the' messager app and had all the experience, personal and servers to pull it off. And most people would trust Canadian servers

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

wait was blackberry canadian?

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Yeah. RIM (the company behind BlackBerry, before they just rebranded to "BlackBerry") was Canada's most lucrative company right up until the release of the iPhone. They focused entirely on the enterprise market and didn't think there was as much demand for consumer smartphones. Shame they didn't see the writing on the wall until it was too late to pivot.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I checked the FAQ and there's nothing on "why Bluesky?". A Canadian PDS and some better moderation tools seems a pretty meagre goal when they could be looking at getting their community off Bluesky.

[–] airportline@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

Bluesky is actually pretty good, but the biggest issue currently is that there's too much power centralized in the hands of Bluesky PBLLC. The less we have to rely on Bluesky PBLLC while still having full functionality, the better.

Also, Northsky is planning on launching it's own AppView, meaning posts that would normally be hidden on Bluesky could still be available from Northsky's client.