this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
34 points (79.3% liked)

movies

2953 readers
706 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It actually looks great!

I personally think it's cool to try a remake in a new medium, the medium is it's own challenge and originality and it brings back a classic for new generations and for nostalgia. I just hope it is good unlike some of the other recent remakes.

[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

This actually looks pretty decent. I'd enjoy it..

.. if I hadn't seen the original already.

So pointless by Disney.

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

My expectations werent high but given these remakes are often 1:1 to originals, I was looking forward to at least seeing Jumbaa. And then they made Jumbaa and Pleakley just regular humans. Boriiiing.

Downside with live action I guess; in the cartoon the disguises are paper-thin but their human clothing is sufficient. Live action uncanny value takes that away from us; they can't even pull it off with Stitch (really highlights "blue koala with bin-lid mouth").

So are we not getting scenes where Jumbaa is so large, heavy, and strong that he causes damage or gets stuck? Where rubbery flexible Pleakley responds to physics or his wibdmilling arms when he panics? Jumbaa and Pleakley are never going to fight over sharing a wig (anf well never see it perched delicately on Jumbaa's head) because they'll simply never use one.

Ruins the fun when you take aliens put of the movie about aliens imo.

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

You can see at the end that Pleakley shows his alien form when someone hits a button so I am guessing they will have human disguises for parts of the movie because it's harder to dress up and alien to look human in a live action movie when the animated one just had them put on a hat and sunglasses.

I'll withhold judgement until I've seen the whole movie but it looks like they captured the important parts of the original. Not gonna become a classic like the original but I'm sure it'll be fun for the kids and at least possibly entertaining for the adults.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The original was perfect. No one needs this.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 16 points 9 hours ago

No one needs any of the live action remakes. They all suck massively compared to the originals.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They spend all this money on live action, but Animation not only looks better, its what most people seem to want.

[–] Zeke@fedia.io 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The goal isn't for people to like the live action, but to hold onto their copyright.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not in this case. Lilo and Stitch is only 23 years old, the copyright isn't close to expiring.

The goal is to make a lot of money, because people will go see these movies. All these Disney live action remakes have made a ton of money.

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

I think people are mixing up copyright up with what Sony does with Spider-Man due to licensing terms. Like not only does copyright last damn near forever, you don't need to keep releasing stuff to renew it and it doesn't just go away because you aren't using it.

There's also a lot of confusion with trademarks. People will often defend big corporations threatening fan art because they "have to defend it or lose their copyright", which is a trademark thing and not copyright.

[–] reattach@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be cheaper to release a direct-to-streaming animated sequel/spin-off?

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

My guess is no?

We used to have direct to VHS/DVD sequels to a lot of Disney films. In fact Lilo & Stich had both a film and TV series.

I'm guessing someone ran the numbers and remaking existing films must be the most profitable. Plus I'm guessing the watch numbers for older content, like Lilo & Stich and sequels, increases which improves Disney+ retention.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 7 points 10 hours ago

Well that was awful.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

I think the new team didn't get the point of the shave ice scene.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

I don't know but I loved it, cant wait to watch it.