this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
23 points (92.6% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2686 readers
773 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] heatofignition@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

The sitting president just did an ad for them in front of the white house. It might rise a little from that, but I would expect the larger downward trend to continue because of the growing anti-Musk sentiment across the country.

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 hours ago

Stock isn't about how much a company is worth, it's how much investors and stockholders think its worth (especially in the future).

Show an ad or make a policy change and enough people saying we are so back will uptick valuation. Making a controversial change will decrease it. Anytime leadership potions are changed, the new CEO/etc is evaluated for stockholders guessing if they're a good choice or a bad one.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Stock price has nothing to do with reality. Even when the stock price goes up or down coinciding with profits going up and down, it's just that -- a coincidence. Many times you'll see amazing earnings and the stock will drop because "it's priced in" (it's always priced in except when it's not) or "future outlook didn't look good" (unlike the amazing outlook of tesla which is promising robots and robotaxis and other vaporware).

Their Q1 earnings report comes out next month, so that'll be interesting at least. Don't expect market reactions to be logical. It may seem to go up or down appropriately, but the primary mover is not reality.

[–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

So even though the value is dropping, it could mean it’s much higher or lower?

[–] technohippie@slrpnk.net 21 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

This is something very common in stocks. In a bear market it is called a "dead cat bounce". Most probably it will go back to keep falling in a few days, if not tomorrow, unless the trend changes which would be very surprising to me.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago

A sudden, sharp decline is also called a 'falling knife', particularly due to how it looks in a box plot, somewhat resembling a bloody dagger.

So... when the market in general tries to 'catch' a 'falling knife'... this produces a 'dead cat bounce' if the market at least temporarily makes the price actually rebound a bit.

So... to ... mix terminology... I guess you catch a falling knife by bouncing a cat off the floor, which goes upward, catches the knife, kills the cat, and then the dead cat with the knife in it collapses through the broken floor.

Hooray daytrader terminology.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

it is called a "dead cat bounce".

Because everything will bounce if you slam it down hard enough. Not the nicest term though

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

At some point it becomes more of a splatter tho, depending on momentum.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

I don't think this 'term' exists, but I hereby propose we call a downward, stairstep series of dead, splattered cat bounces, a 'bear feast'.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 18 points 7 hours ago

Pretty easy to understand, someone bought the dip. Keep pushing down.

[–] MomoGajo@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You expected the market to suddenly behave rationally and value a company according to actual value? First time?

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Too short maybe

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Something happened behind the scenes during that White House event.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago

can you elaborate?

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Look at what happened to the stock on Feb 11, it dropped, came back up for a few days, then dropped again. That could be repeating.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago