this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
829 points (99.8% liked)

Buy European

2191 readers
3575 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Matrix Chat

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

!buyfromeu@feddit.org

Buying and Selling:

!flohmarkt@lemmy.ca

Boycott:

!boycottus@lemmy.ca


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

Oligarchs used to act the part, and have the appearance of being "classy".

Now Oligarchs are just a bunch of 4chan users.

Wtf is: "Be quiet, small man"

That's not an elegant way of speaking.

These people are supposed to be "upper class"?

🀣

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 hour ago

Disgusting. Why the FUCK would you talk to our allies this way? The guy is a polish government official.. (I mean obviously I know why, Elon is a megalomaniac).

"Small man"??? WTF. I hate it.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 6 points 1 hour ago

But what SpaceX does is so cool, and for the greater good of the humanity!

/s

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 18 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If America was a real country this guy would've immediately been removed from any and all companies he runs.

Does SpaceX not have a board?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

SpaceX bggest customer by far is the US gvernment. Obviously that is run by Musk, so they will not fire him.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

But why? Why did t NASA do this. Instead government funded it and a private citizen controls it and gets all the benefits.

I think you answered your own question.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 10 points 2 hours ago

They’re all his pawns

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Don't let the fascists fool you, there are alternatives to Starlink. Eutelsat in France, Telesat in Canada and Inmarsat in the UK, just to name a few examples.

[–] bradd@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Why is starlink being used, do you know?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 hours ago

It’s faster, cheaper, and on the tech side more reliable (definitely not politically reliable though).

[–] learningduck@programming.dev 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

My guess is better coverage and latency with its sheer number of satellites.

They use low earth orbit, which require them to use more satellites, but lowered latency.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Technically, and this is purely semantics, coverage is the major downside to starlink. They are faster, though.

The coverage of satellites has an exponential factor of the distance of that satellite to earth. If you had the satellite further out then its signal could reach a wider area before being cut off by the curvature of the earth. However, as the distance increases, so does latency.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Now, I don't know, but I would assume its the latency. Starlink has a (impressively) low ping of < 100ms, while existing alternatives usually have 600ms+. Now, that's only relevant if they are using it for stuff like flying drones.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago

I think you'd notice half a second even just browsing the Web.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

TBH I think any more low orbit telecom satellite arrays than we already have are just going to become a huge problem in the following decades.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Starlink is already being a problem currently, and it's not even fully deployed

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This has been commented before.

Starlink flies at a very low altitude, meaning relatively high atmospheric drag, and a very short period of time before their sats deorbit if they go dead, less than ten years.

It's nowhere near the problem everyone makes it out to be.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Official statemens claim they run for about 5 years, deorbit anywhere, and do NOT always burn up in reentry.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago

Elon is an absolute clown there are alternatives they just aren’t as robust at this time.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This post has more upvotes on Lemmy than Reddit

[–] Snowstorm@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

Let my add one more then!

[–] Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

It's time for Europe to finally get their own solutions.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago

Here's one: https://www.skydsl.eu/en-DE/Personal/Satellite-internet/Tariffs/Private/Overview

Seems to be about half as expensive as Starlink. 700ms latency though. So you won't be gaming skydsl.

[–] Renohren@lemmy.today 14 points 4 hours ago

It's called One Web by Eutelsat. Same latency and reliability, but less Mb/s about 70 Mb/s (and does it matter much for the few Kb packets to relay small amounts of data?).

[–] xye@lemm.ee 27 points 5 hours ago

Ah, the full Hitler, a bold move let’s see how it plays out.

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 47 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

"My starlink system". He's literally a walking, talking "you made this? I made this" meme.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

I get what you're saying, but I refer to my car as...my car. I didn't turn a wrench in its construction, nor did I design it, but it's still mine.

[–] phampyk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Except for the fact that he doesn't make anything, he pays people who do, then takes the credit for it. Is his way with everything: companies, gaming profiles...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rraggl@feddit.nl 5 points 4 hours ago

That would be Eutelsat, but it is smaller in scale (at the moment) and therefore more expensive. It's also said to be less userfriendly, but that should be possible to fix.

[–] adm@lemm.ee 222 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (14 children)

When the war was turning in Ukraine's favor and they were about to push into Russia, he shut it off and crippled their counter offensive. I remember. Fuck Elon and fuck starlink.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 26 minutes ago

Oh no I'm hearing from people that wa a technical glitch.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Which is why Starlink needs to be confiscated and managed by NATO. Somebody has to operate it, and it should be an entity who is on the side of Freedom amd Democracy.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί