this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
431 points (99.5% liked)

Gaming

2822 readers
612 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the 70s when suddenly everything was "Eco-Friendly".

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (5 children)

I remember an old song "I'll go green when they go green and they'll go green but not really green more like aquamarine" and it appears to no longer exist on the internet.

Another song I can't find is about a guy who tells the story of all his past lives and in each he was a whore and someday he'll be a whore again.

Really wish songs would stop disappearing.

[–] mke@programming.dev 2 points 14 hours ago

Yours is the most captivating comment in this entire thread.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I have to admit neither one of those rings a bell.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lmao. The “organic” labeling has made it to electronics.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago

Certified Artisanally Hand-Crafter Code

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

just as meaningless too!

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't mean much without validation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 38 points 1 day ago (8 children)

They cannot possibly assure customers that remote devs aren't using copilots to help them code.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Indie studio teams are pretty small so its possible, I personally hate that the word copilot ever even appears and never ever autogen code, but moreso I'm sure the stamp refers to art, texture, and sound.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] bia@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Not sure how to interpret this. The use of any tool can be for good or bad.

If the quality of the game is increased by the use of AI, I'm all for it. If it's used to generate a generic mess, it's probably not going to be interesting enough for me to notice it's existence.

If they mean that they don't use AI to generate art and voice over, I guess it can be good for a medium to large game. But if using AI means it gets made at all, that's better no?

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago

I am for the most part angry that people are being put out of work by AI; I actually find AI-generated content interesting sometimes, for example AI Frank Sinatra singing W.A.P. is pretty funny. This label is helpful to me so that I know I'm supporting humans monetarily.

[–] deur@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago (34 children)

People want pieces of art made by actual humans. Not garbage from the confident statistics black box.

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

What if they use it as part of the art tho?

Like a horror game that uses an AI to just slightly tweak an image of the paintings in a haunted building continuously everytime you look past them to look just 1% creepier?

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Would the feature in that horror game Zort where you sometimes use the player respon item and it respons an NPC that will use clips of what a specific dead player has said while playing count as AI use? If so, that's a pretty good use of AI in horror games in my opinion.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

AI SLOP! SAD!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mke@programming.dev 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

That's an interesting enough idea in theory, so here's my take on it, in case you want one.

Yes, it sounds magical, but:

  • AI sucks at make it more X. It doesn't understand scary, so you'll get worse crops of the training data, not meaningful changes.
  • It's prohibitively expensive and unfeasible for the majority of consumer hardware.
  • Even if it gets a thousand times cheaper and better at its job, is GenAI really the best way to do this?
  • Is it the only one? Are alternatives also built on exploitation? If they aren't, I think you should reconsider.
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›