this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
875 points (98.0% liked)

politics

20359 readers
3196 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bias fucking bullshit. Why is Joe Rogan named and not the podcast that usurped him? Media fucking blows

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They name it in the first sentence, and at least for me, given it's longevity and word of mouth I know what Joe Rogan implies, but if you said "MeidasTouch" in the headline, I'd have no idea the implication of that shift, since I haven't listened to either of the two.

[–] eronth@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You can do both in a title.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

You can, but clickbait rags want you to click to find out what they intentionally left out of the title.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Wdym? It literally says the podcast name is "The MeidasTouch Podcast" in the first sentence.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Headlines are important

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Wish this podcast got attention before the election.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 181 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why don't they list MeidasTouch in the headline?

Better title: "Pro-America podcast MeidasTouch dethrones shitty pro-donvict podcast in the charts"

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Eeeeh. I can't be the only one who won't touch something described as "pro-America" with a ten foot pole.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 132 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Just listened a bit. These guys deep dive quite a bit, but I hope that this bump is from people who are previous Trump voters that now realize how fucked they are by Trump and get angry.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 91 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Unlikely. Trump is a cult. He can do no wrong.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 42 points 3 days ago

He's created that in large part because of the media environment around him. Many republicans were upset and outraged on Jan 6th until they heard the fox news, rogan, etc line

Change the media consumption and a lot will follow from there. Changes to which media are more dominate are going to matter more than people think

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 91 points 3 days ago (57 children)

Less than a month into the new administration, the rise of the left-leaning MeidasTouch to become the country's most popular podcast indicates a potential shift in tone currently resonating with Americans.

Is it actually Leftist or is it liberal? I'd welcome a number one Leftist show, but I don't think most USA citizens are politically literate enough to know the difference. We've been brainwashed by decades of propaganda to think liberalism is synonymous with Leftist.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They self identify as progressive and it seems that they are, so definitely not liberals. I stopped clicking Brian Tyler Cohen videos though because he does clickbait bullshit like "trump gets NIGHTMARE legal news" or "trump campaign SUNK" and it ends up being some legal bullshit they have to re-file because they messed it up the first time, or something stupid like that. Seriously just scroll through his shorts. It's awful.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (56 replies)
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 3 days ago (10 children)

According to Podscribe.
Which collects data from more than the single-source Spotify.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Ugh Ben Shapiro is that high?

[–] comradegreetingcard@lemmy.ml 51 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Candace Owens is higher....

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Wait a minute ... THIS IS THE BAD PLACE!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I was wondering why my dad texted me today to tell me George Soros was planning to fund anti Trump podcasts

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

crazy to me that he's thinking the guy who might be funding anti Trump podcasts is a threat and not the richest man in the world who has agents infiltrating and collecting data on every government agency. Like, is dudes tin foil hat on right?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It is amazing how fast their propaganda machines work. They will anticipate breaking stories and provide bullshit lines of reasoning to discredit them before they are even widely shared.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don't think it's that amazing when you consider there's multiple groups staffed by PhD professors with decades of expertise being paid to sit around all day and anticipate this stuff. Hell Trisha Paytas does this on her own .

The thing that kids me is why we're all so terrible at finding counters to this stuff.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

They've had decades to finely tune the propaganda machine — utilizing surveillance capitalism, big data, and analytics — A/B testing their PsyOps campaigns in real-time.

The whole Cambridge Analytica debacle occurred almost a decade ago, and every criminal involved went on to bigger and better criminal enterprises. Major political parties across western "democracies" were directly involved in treasonous disinformation campaigns against their own citizens — a multinational corporate oligarchy were directly involved — that's why there were zero consequences...

We've already been living in corporate dictatorships for a long time. We just didn't know it yet.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago

We’ve already been living in corporate dictatorships for a long time. We just didn’t know it yet.

Can't really overstate that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Sad to say, but it's likely some of this bump they're getting is TYT listeners/viewers leaving after Cenk and Anna's latest spar with literally everyone near their orbit (and even losing some contributors). Many -oh so many- disaffected MSNBC viewers turned to non-traditional media after 2016, I cannot imagine how many might be leaving for more actually progressive sources after the recent election... but TYT has fumbled the bag here by both attacking other progressives AND doing shit like Charlie Kirk "debates" and interviews with Tucker Carlson.

I really hope they turn the ship around, because going after MAGA die hards isn't the answer. At any rate, Majority Report seems to be doing just fine so there's that.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

TYT telling the trans woman on staff that "Ana knows better than she does about how to help the trans community" was the final straw for me. You don't get to silence a minority group by saying you're doing it for their benefit.

The subsequent doubling down of "actually we're the victims here!" was just confirmation.

[–] bayesianbandit@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't know these people but even just reading that already made me so tired. I'm so ready for everybody to forget we exist again.

2020-2030 is really making 2000-2010 seem like paradise out here, which is something I never thought I'd say, as a trans woman who barely survived 2000-2010. 🙃

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

If only they would bother to vote.

That's where you come in my friend. It's going to take boots in the ground and hard work to get people to vote. I'm going to do my part, I hope you will to. 💙

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Let’s see if there’ll be another chance.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Meh. Dumb voters will just flock to the next trigger topic.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Listen. It's not just dumb voters. It's a conservative propaganda vessel that funds any right-leaning talking points. It's madness being poured into any willing ear, all it takes is a little fear to let them in. I want to believe that individual volition trumps this by-the-numbers propaganda, but the proof is in the pudding. Make people scared and isolated and you can make them believe whatever shit you want (at least, on a macro scale)

[–] anon593839@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Totally. I know plenty of people who would be considered smart by any standard, but when you're mainlining propaganda every hour, of every day, for multiple decades... it'll twist a person.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TomHanx_TripleSix@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're not wrong but any cultural shift like this is enough to cling to optimism. If/when the fast food catches up to Trump and he croaks JD Vance will be the one trying to defend these trash policies. Him (or anybody else) are not going to be as effective bullshit artists....

LOOK HOW DESPERATE I AM FOR GOOD NEWS. LET ME HAVE THIS!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›