this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
373 points (98.2% liked)

Open Source

32747 readers
145 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NightShot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Could someone explain the backpedalling if rust is more secure ?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that article is horrible to read! every paragraph starts with quotation, but then never closes it😵

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol -3 points 2 days ago

he looks like some kind of dino, i cant figure out which one

[–] droplet6585@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Can someone distill the good faith argument against rust? Is there one?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

it's more niche than C, has less competency available, works very differently to C, and requires a whole new toolchain to be added to the already massive kernel compilation process. for it to be plain sailing adding it to the kernel some of the worlds' foremost domain experts on operating systems would have to re-learn basically everything.

~~also since rust is just coming up on 15 years of existence without a 1.0 release, there's no way to ensure that the code written today will be considered well-formed by the time 1.0 hits.~~

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

for it to be plain sailing adding it to the kernel some of the worlds’ foremost domain experts on operating systems would have to re-learn basically everything.

This is the core problem. It's a social problem, not a technical one.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›