this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
184 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19686 readers
3591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Republicans are considering taxing employer-provided benefits like transit passes, free meals, and on-site gyms to help offset the cost of Trump’s proposed $10 trillion tax cuts.

The move could generate $157 billion over 10 years but faces opposition due to its potential impact on worker morale and return-to-office policies.

Experts warn it could lower employee productivity and force companies to reconsider benefits.

While the proposal remains uncertain, lawmakers may be forced to adopt unpopular measures to fund the tax cuts amid a $36 trillion federal deficit.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shapptastic@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Awesome, way to combine RTO mandates with also cutting commuter benefits - can’t wait to pay an extra $100/mo to take the train instead of driving.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Especially with the dipshit control freaks looking to have everyone "back in the office".

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

we do one day in person in office a week. I need to meet with the COO, CTO and CFO for some RFQ of a new product thing. I literally need their physical presence for some documents etc. It has been delayed three weeks so far because none of them come to the in person office days lmao.

4 of my 5 regular occurring meetings on this are virtual because they meet with out of state contractors, clients or similar. Also I'm the only one who eats lunch at 1 instead of 12, and I regularly have clashing meetings, so I am literally driving 2 hours a week to go to a different place to take my virtual meetings and eat lunch alone in a canteen instead of my kitchen

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder how many redhat dipshits still think that 10 trillion dollars being given to the already obscenely rich will be "trickling down" to them.

And this is AFTER they keep lecturing the Democrats on how they "lost the working class"...what do you tell voters who are so stupid as to believe this kind of thing? At what point do you HAVE to blame the voters for being this stupid?

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, most red hats either didn't have a cushy job with these benefits, or have such a cushy job that they don't need/use the benefits. A lot of red hats were pissed people could work from home because they don't have the opportunity to (factory/field service/onsite work), so they feel like this is fine. This will probably disproportionately affect college educated libs. Rich CEOs have their own gyms, poor Rs never got the luxury.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

To be honest, most workers would rather have a much different thing than things like free meals/snacks and other kinds of perks. Most of them would rather be treated like adults and be allowed to work from home full or most of the time. But if a company insists on having them come in and gives a perk that takes the sting out of that cost, it's the least they could do.

But I guess the edgelords like Musk cannot even have that. Soon to be trillionaire telling others they should "live within their means".

Also, the red hats that have jobs that don't let them work remotely, but want to make the lives of others worse? Fuck them with a rusty chainsaw.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Yea, I wasn't agreeing with them or anything, just adding that perspective. I've worked places with and without those perks and though IME they boosted morale, it's definitely not a replacement for things like good pay or WFH options.

A lot of R policies and voters come from a place of making sure everyone's life is as hard as possible rather than making things better. They didn't have free/low cost education options? Neither can you. They had to go hungry? So should kids nowadays. They were beaten by their parents? They should get to as well. They have X difficulty or disability and it was not accommodated? Get rid of the ADA! To them, that's what equality means. That's why they scoff at the concept of both equality to access and equality of outcomes. They're both unfathomable to them. It's sad really. They think just because not everyone can live the same life, we shouldn't try to make them as comparable as possible, because from their perspective no one helped them (regardless of if that's the case or not).

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I don't think they're getting the memo to what's actually happening. They think they're still fighting a culture war when it's always been a class war.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i hope it passes. the working class revolution needs to happen sooner rather than when they decide to outlaw guns and put up a great firewall.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Will Left Accelerationism work ?

[–] prototypez9er@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. It's going to push us right into fascism. This guy's a dipshit.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

There's no historical evidence to suggest that it would.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't know if this was an article from a regular columnist or a guest contributor, but it seems the editor missed a detail. The US has a $36 trillion debt, not a $36 trillion deficit.

[–] jackanoodle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Jesus fuck these ideas to make a bad idea seem good just keep getting worse.