this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

news

24547 readers
773 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imnecomrade@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If RedNote isn't banned right away, this just shows how incompetent our bourgeoisie are. A 4 year old could maintain capitalist order 10x better than these morons. Amerikkka just needs to throw in the towel. China keeps winning while this sad sack of a country can't even figure out the controls.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Donald Trump had asked the Supreme Court to delay TikTok’s ban-or-sale law to give him an opportunity to act once he returns to the White House.

This really is a hot turd no one wants to deal with, isn't it? The current administration has stated they won't enforce the law, which kicks it off to the Trump camp. It's fun watching this shit fish swim up the legal channels of our "democracy" as the rest of our dear leaders cower over who has to actually eat it.

Several justices from across the ideological spectrum also emphasized that foreign entities do not have First Amendment rights and that the site could continue to operate in a similar manner but under different, non-Chinese ownership.

Such a wide spectrum of thought, wouldn't you say Karl ol' pal?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

that last part kinda lays bare how material influence matters more than any notions of fReE sPeEcH because real control is exerted via the platform and its material dependencies, not the law

[–] someone@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

The American ruling class' ideological spectrum is just a line segment ranging from "We love cheap labour more than we hate POC" to "We hate POC more than we love cheap labour".

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Do not take the treats away from a country of treatlers and marxist-treatlenists

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

So much for free speech.

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Open linkedin and see who is in TikTok's US Cyber Department. A whoooole lot of BAE Systems, Lockheed, Boeing, US Department of State, XYZ Branch of Military, etc.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

These motherfuckers

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I'm just here to gloat a bit at all the very curious people who were for some reason convinced in the threads here on this when they were hearing it that it sounded like they were against the government and were going to rule in favor of Tiktok. Kind of reassess your thought process if that was you.

Doesn't look good to lurking liberals to see the Marxists/"leftists" making predictions like that and face-planting. One of the strongest things Marxism has going for it is predictive power. They didn't build up all that momentum and have all those issues with it just to flub it at the finish line and shrug about their norms.

But this is good ruling in that it opens the door wide for US gangsterism. Every foreign company operating in the US should see this as the highest court announcing they are not protected by basic law, they are not protected by the basic guarantees of the foundational US law and are subject to whatever whims the current congress or president wants to impose. Mighty nice business environment you have there, if it wasn't an important market companies would flee at this but sadly it is an important market but it should give companies pause and hopefully encourage foreign entities to take steps to reduce their exposure. It also exposes of course to tens of millions of Americans the nature of their government, of the censorship and control that liberalism pretends isn't there. It exposes a third of the country to the fact that their free speech loving government is hypocritical. Most will brush it off and go back to Zuckerberg treats, but some amount will not. Some amount will have their faith further eroded and some will even begin to experience class consciousness.