644

People who have never been to L.A. really have no idea how insanely huge it is. Driving to my apartment from the start of city (before you even get to L.A. county) and having the city just keep going and going and going for two hours and not because of traffic jams is something you have to experience to truly understand.

(page 2) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vivavideri@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

NC has a higher pop than LA county.
Wake county (NC) has a higher pop than MT.

I lived near Orange for a while. The way the cities and towns have 0 gaps between them was nuts to me. It's just.. you cross the street.

In MT you have 2 lane roads with several miles in between. The county I'm in now doesn't touch the interstate. Wild.

Also means the fires out here, as terrifying as they are to my hurricane-seasoned ass, are more likely to take out stuff in the middle of nowhere and a handful of houses, not entire swaths of suburbia.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Really REALLY exemplifies how ridiculous our "representative" system is.

[-] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

My state is not there. Is this all states or just some of them?

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I don't see any missing states. Maybe I'm mistaken but I do believe I see 50 states

[-] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

There are states in other countries.

load more comments (4 replies)

The State of Depression is not on there 🤷‍♂️

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hmm, it's too soon to make the obvious fire joke...

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

That's why it's a miserable dump.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're right by most accounts, but there's the whole fire thing that makes this insensitive.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There are a lot of reasons to complain about L.A., but acting like Hollywood and L.A. are equivalents and Hollywood isn't just a really shitty part of L.A. with a lot of tourists (so of course a lot of panhandlers will be there) is like acting like all of Las Vegas is just The Strip.

Most of L.A. is not Hollywood. I lived in the Valley and you didn't see what you're seeing in that photo. The places you will see a huge number of homeless in L.A. are Hollywood, for the reason I already stated, Downtown because Skid Row is long-established and hospitals actually dump people there when they discharge them (when I lived in L.A., they dumped someone's grandmother with advanced dementia there in a hospital gown) and Santa Monica and Venice on the beach because of both the tourists and the fact that sleeping on sand is a hell of a lot more comfortable than sleeping on concrete.

Like I said, L.A. has a lot of problems, but calling L.A. a miserable dump based just on Hollywood is silly. Don't base your opinion on a city on where the tourists go, it's always going to be one of the worst parts of town.

I lived most of my time in L.A. in North Hollywood. It has nothing to do with Hollywood proper. It's in the Valley and there's a mountain range between it and Hollywood. It was never like that when I lived there as it was gentrifying, and now it's a hip arts district that you would have no real reason to see if you were a tourist.

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Homeless: serious problem, been a problem. Heartless evil the way they're treated now.

Water supply: serious problem, been a problem. Los Angeles is the highest consumer of electricity in California, mainly because the energy is spent on treating and transporting water. Highly inefficient.

Air pollution: serious problem, been a problem. Closely tied to...

Traffic congestion: serious problem, been a problem.

There has been major improvement in drug deaths. Actually quite good numbers there.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Okay, but your characterization as L.A. being full of panhandlers because of a photo of a bunch of people panhandling in a tourist area was not exactly an honest view of the city.

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

I thought the photo was impactful, with the stars. It's similar to a photo that first got me looking at LA and some of it's problems.

I know it's a big city. But the leadership seems so inept.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 1 week ago

New York? That surprises me.

[-] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

Ohio is the surprising one to me. Big state I guess.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Most of Ohio cities exist solely for industry. Cincinnati for transit (river + trains + air), Dayton for WPAFB (formerly a major canal for the ohio river), and Toledo for the Goodyear plant and lake Erie access; thats all i remember off the top of my head.

[-] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not true of Ohio based on a quick Google search. I think this map might be quite wrong

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
644 points (96.8% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3598 readers
10 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS