Class warfare.
Politics
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only
▪️ Title must match the article headline
▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)
▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.
Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body.
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
Record profits are stolen wages.
Calling it “the Biden overtime rule” is kind of misleading. The rule was always there: they just tried to change the threshold, plus automatically adjust for inflation
Here’s the thing:
- article points out 2004, and the threshold was about median wage
- Obama attempted to increase but was rejected by court
- Trump increasing by a smaller amount
- Biden attempted to increase but was rejected
Aside from the seeming partisanship in the court, an increase
- was accepted when set to about median wage
- rejected when set noticeably above median wage.
While I agree it’s set way too low and needs to be raised, it’s quite plausible the court decided that too much above median wage is a difference in kind, that should be set by Congress. Maybe if we had a functional Congress …..