195
submitted 2 days ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/gaming@lemmy.zip

It's clear that PEGI don't understand the industry at all.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Isn't PEGI just the publishers governing themselves?

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Correct. Just like the ESRB

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

That's how it's often being done. They are doing this in order to prevent government censorship. Same with the equivalent USK (for games) and FSK (for movies) in Germany (which are now powerful enough that it can't be overruled by the government BPjM anymore, which could previously ban games and other media even if certified by independent rating agencies), MPAA for movies in America (and previously the Hays Code), etc. It's different in countries like Australia, where the government can directly rate media and thus exert much more influence on it.

[-] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

I didn't realize they pegged Balatro at PEGI 18. Definitely ridiculous. Kids play poker all the time without gambling. It's a card game. I don't think there is a less objectionable game out there.

[-] limitedduck@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago

Agreed that it's ridiculous, but there are plenty of other games out there that are less objectionable, like ones that are played almost exclusively by kids.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

The only apolitical game is Tetris.

... not counting the story of developing and distributing Tetris.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 2 days ago

I don't think there is a less objectionable game out there.

Candyland?

[-] DerArzt@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Okay but that's not a game, it's an existential crisis.

[-] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Who is/are the author/s behind this piece? Could you please link to them?

[-] DerArzt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago

I would expect this kind of Puritanical pearl clutching in the US, not Europe.

Apparently, any game that uses straights, flushes, and full houses gets an adults-only rating, but games with addictive psychological dark patterns designed to maximize microtransaction revenue are fine for children. What a world we live in.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago

Oh shit, I thought PEGI 18 was a game publisher. It seemed like their start screen logo was on all the best stuff.

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

Wait, for real - or am I missing a joke here?

In case I'm not, are you also confused about middleware like Bink, Havok and SpeedTree?

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Those at least say what they are. Bink will say it's a video encoder. I just remember a voice saying "PEGI 18" but no other stuff about what that meant so I thought it was a publisher.

[-] limitedduck@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago

It's true that playing for money is a huge part of playing poker at all, both casually and professionally. Does that mean a game just teaching poker hands should be considered as adult as actual gambling? If so, a game like The Binding of Isaac should get the same 18+ as Balatro since it has actual slot machines that you put money into, but instead it gets a 16+.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
195 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

2578 readers
90 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS