this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
105 points (98.2% liked)

Pokémon

372 readers
1 users here now

A Lemmy community dedicated to Pokémon.

Keep content SFW.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 47 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 25 points 10 months ago

with how rushed pokemon's firs gen was because the studio was running out of money, i wouldn't be surprised if this was a mistake they knew about, wanted to fix, but just had to roll with because it wasn't the end of the world

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 15 points 10 months ago

That does make more sense.

[–] HeavenlySpoon@ttrpg.network 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ummm, actually… Based on the internal IDs, the Caterpie line was added all at once way after Venonat and later Venomoth. If there had been a readjustment or error, you’d expect these not to be in sequence (like with Wartortle losing its evolution and getting the first-design-phase Blastoise in its place). They may have decided to scrap Venonat, but then needed a prevo for Venomoth and kept it in despite the similarities to Butterfree, but having an evolutionary link between Metapod and Venomoth seems highly unlikely.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

Interesting, that's probably why the theory remained a theory

[–] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I prefer the dratini->gyrados / magikarp->dragonite pipeline theory, myself, but I can gestate with this caterpie branch. The venonat->butterfree coloring and eyes do seem too coincidental. Maybe the artists that worked on each one had their favorite colors, so pokemon they did all ended up schemed similarly?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 10 months ago

Getting the once overpowered swiper from a Magicarp would be...lol