52
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by zlatiah@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

This is definitely a bit of a stupid question... but methinks this happens to a good number of immigrants. Asking because there is a bit of a funny philosophical debate here:

  • Technically the second language is not "native" by virtue of you not growing up with it
  • But you speak it better than your native language, so skill-wise it is "native"

So do you have "native" language skills, or would you consider yourself simply highly "fluent" at the second language?

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 weeks ago

Fluent.

Native means you grew up speaking it.

[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 20 points 3 weeks ago

English is my second language and also my best language. I like to joke that "English isn't my first language" when I say something silly - always good for an eyeroll from my spouse. But generally, I consider English my best language and my first language as my first/native language, I guess.

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

It depends on whether you treat the answer as "like a native" or "I am a native". The word native is etymologically rooted in "born into it".

To sum up: You can speak a second language better than a native and have a proficiency of a native speaker without being a native speaker of the language.

[-] kozy138@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago

My first language was Polish, but I've lived in the US most of my life and my English is better than many Americans'. So now I say that I'm a native English speaker who is fluent in Polish.

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 10 points 3 weeks ago

Native means you grew up with it. Otherwise it's not native no matter how good you are.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I feel like that leaves a little weird wiggle room though.

Let's say you're born in a Spanish speaking country, maybe Mexico, for the first few years of life you grow up surrounded by Spanish speakers, your first words are in Spanish, you only know Spanish, everyone you know only speaks Spanish.

Then when you're about 3 years old, before you're even forming really solid, permanent memories, you go to live in the US, you're surrounded by English speakers, almost everyone around you stops speaking Spanish regularly and switches to English, your English vocabulary quickly catches up to or maybe even surpasses your Spanish ability. Your first real memories are of people speaking English, and you spend the rest of your life primarily speaking English. You still speak Spanish though, you keep up with your education in that language and can speak both fluently.

I think there's a valid argument that both could be considered your native language, even if Spanish was your first language, you've still grown up speaking both.

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

If you start at 3 years old, I'd say that counts as native

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

ok, so what's the age cutoff? I moved from turkey when I was nine.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

I think there's a difference between first language and native.

I believe native means a level of language equivalent to the people of the place where that language is talked.

A first language is usually spoken at native level because most people will have been using it all their lives. But if you don't because you moved away or whatever reason I don't think you'll have a native level.

On the other hand you can become native in a language that's not your first language. If you speak it so well that's indistinguishable from any other person from that place.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I speak four languages at native level, because I can change languages mid sentence and you wouldn't know which one is my actual origin language (hint: it's two).

I'm more than fluent. Fluent just means you can speak in complete coherent sentences without hesitation. You can do this but still have a strong accent - like many of the Indian tech wizards, for instance.

Native, to me, means that it's practically indistinguishable from a person that grew up in that country, and you can't tell that I didn't actually grow up in that country.

[-] electric@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I just say my Spanish fluent. I can have a conversation, but it will have a lot of pauses as I try to remember a word. Certainly not usable at an academic level.

I was graced by parents who don't know their own language very well. Google Translate's more reliable, so there is a lot of vocabulary I don't know simply because it's never been brought up in my family.

I just consider English my main language. I feel bad for the immigrants who were raised not even knowing their language though. Met a few.

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

My first language is Cantonese, spoken by parent at home.

My second language is Mandarin. Only spoken in school when I was in China, which lasted till I was like grade 1-2.

My third language is English (USA English, that is). Started learning around grade 2-3.

Since arriving in the US, I basically never spoke Mandarin ever again. Like 10+ years now.

English is my most fluent language. I could probably form complex speeches in English, well I mean... I'm basically born here, minus the first decade of my life. I can maybe say a few basic ideas in Cantonese, but cannot discuss anything meaningful like politics, medical stuff, or bussiness terms. I can barely express any ideas in Mandarin. I'd have to think about it in Cantonese, then convert it in my mind into Mandarin, although both are Chinese, there are some unique "quirks" that make some phrases slightly different.

If I went to China today, I'd probably sound like either (1) a new immigrant from korea, japan, or vietnam; or (2) someone with an intellectual disability. In contrast, I could probably talk to any tourist or bussiness people visiting China and have a full conversation with them and they'd be shocked why a "Chinese looking" person can speak perfect English.

I have no idea what "native" language even means anymore. I'd probably describe English as my "most proficient language" and Cantonese as an "old and forgotten tongue"

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, I just judge the native speakers who suck at their own language (jk I'm not that much of a dickhead)

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago

Depends how badly you speak your native language?

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I call it my "main" or "primary" language. My first language lacks vocabulary due to atrophy and stopping learning it after turning 9.

I learnt german in school, and lost it all.

I'm currently learning spanish

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

From a linguistics standpoint, there are some things you have with a native language that you don't have with a second language by definition (e.g. native speaker intuition). By that metric, your second language cannot be native.

But it's actually more complicated than that. I'd suggest there needs to be better definition on what counts as a second language for your question.

Brain plasticity as it pertains to language acquisition may (=depending on what study you cite) stick around until the late teens. That means that consistent and continued exposure to a language community will ultimately lead to acquisition if the learner/acquirer is not beyond the critical period threshold. If that occurs, you'd be a native bilingual (or multilingual), and you wouldn't really have learned a "second language". You would have two native languages, and in both you would have e.g. native speaker intuition.

This is kind of what you're asking, but the issue is what is meant by "second language". If you mean an L2 which was learned by someone after the critical period, then I'd argue that speaker would never be native in that L2 regardless of their proficiency. But if you mean an L2 which was acquired before thr end of the critical period, then by definition it is another native language, not a second one.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm still better in my native tongue than in English, but I would still consider myself 'fluent', with some people considering me 'native', which I would never claim for me. This I would call "personal relativity", as I am probably more fluent in English than quite some native speakers. And I definitely read English faster than most native speakers.

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

I just describe it as "bilingual level", because fluent is often used but can represent a range of levels depending on how demanding you are.

For me, fluent is what I'd describe someone who's studied well and can live only speaking the target language. They may have a crappy accent, make mistakes but they know they can express their ideas and be understood and generally don't search for words.

I'd use "native level", but that can be a bit misleading too.

And so, that's why we have exams/diploma with levels and such.
If someone tells you they have a C2 level diploma in French, I assure you that their command of French is worthy of respect even for a native French person.

If I tell you I have HSK3/4 even in Chinese, you know I'm nowhere near fluency, despite how well I can fake it with what little I do know! :P

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
52 points (96.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36057 readers
864 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS