94
submitted 4 days ago by m_f@midwest.social to c/msp@midwest.social

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22334414

Summary

Two transgender women, Dahlia and Jess, were attacked at a Minneapolis rail station, with onlookers cheering their assailants instead of helping.

After confronting a man yelling transphobic slurs, the situation escalated into a violent assault involving four or five others, leaving both women unconscious.

Advocates attribute the rise in anti-trans violence to emboldened transphobia fueled by misinformation and political rhetoric, including Donald Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ policies.

The local trans community is responding with solidarity rallies, self-defense classes, and firearm training to prepare for a potential increase in attacks.

Police are investigating, but no arrests have been made.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 32 points 4 days ago

Very Christian guys. I'm sure Jesus would love all this violence!

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

"Jesus is a woke DEI hire and we don't listen to that libshit."

-American "Religious" Right

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 4 days ago

Middle eastern hippie Jew says be kind to each other and pay taxes! Nail to cross!

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

This is America. They'd shoot him or lynch him. We don't like to waste time when we execute innocents.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

Slave labor is legal so long as they may make him work a bit beforehand.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 11 points 3 days ago

Some of these fucking comments, jeez. Interesting how its always the highly victimized populations who get the "Kumbayah" speech, and not the people who follow those populations around harassing them to use ANY response as justification for violence.

[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 24 points 4 days ago

I just don't understand how so much hate can exist for your fellow person :(

[-] R3D4CT3D@midwest.social 8 points 4 days ago

truly appalling & super sad :(

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago

Please arm yourselves and learn to shoot. Never pull a gun you are unwilling or unable to shoot.

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Problem: I want to kill myself, owning a firearm is probably a bad idea

[-] R3D4CT3D@midwest.social 16 points 4 days ago

taser + pepper gel are good alternatives to a firearm, if yr unwilling or unable to shoot at someone.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

people shouldn't need to murder other people in order to live safely. responsibility for 100% of this falls on the violent fuckheads who assault innocents. nothing more needs to be done than taking them out of the community. asserting that innocent victims safety should be predicated on their ability to shoot others, and the likelihood that assholes willing to assault innocent people are also the same kinds of assholes who would carry firearms leads me to believe that the assholes are the problem, not the victims.

for fuck's sake, stop blaming victims and fix the fuckheads already.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You cannot fix stupid in anyone else except yourself. You cannot force curiosity or self awareness. You can inspire them, but this is not deterministic.

It sucks. It is not blaming the victim. It is acknowledgement of the fact that worrying about things you cannot change is a pointless and useless waste of time. Only worry about things that are within your power to change right now. You can alter you. You can take every measure available to defend and protect you. In the present climate of politics, you need to take every available measure seriously. I have no emotion in this recommendation. It has nothing to do with blame or individuals. I don't care that the victims here were trans. To me, we're all just a spectrum of people and no people deserve prejudice or discrimination when they do no harm. Those that do harm deserve discrimination.

A gun is no guarantee and can be just as dangerous to the person carrying it, but personally, I would rather have control over my own destiny even if that means I only get to decide the one other person that leaves with me or if I'm ready to check out. That last one is loaded with my own chronic outlook and not intended as any implication or insinuation. I battle a lot with being a useless burden to family and get a ton of prejudice for other reasons. I get it. Life can suck when you're different. Don't go picking battles with your allies and friends willing to tell you the hard truths with love.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Don’t get into gunfights in train stations ffs

[-] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 4 days ago

Counterpoint: get into a gunfight anywhere someone is trying to beat you to death and you have a gun

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Fistfights exist everywhere but rampant gun violence does not. “Buy a gun to deal with that hypothetical problem” is terrible advice compared to, idk, deescalation training. Yeah if you’re already on the ground getting punched in the face it’s too late to deescalate but there were choices made before that. Buying a gun so you can shoot up a train station isn’t exactly the most beneficial way to deal with bigots as a society.

[-] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Non-fatally shooting one or two among a group of men that's got you down on the ground attacking you is not "rampant gun violence."

The problem is not hypothetical, we're discussing it as it just happened.

It's important to de-escalate, you're right. Owning a firearm comes with many responsibilities that you must uphold as a gun owner, and responsibly weilding the firearm (including and especially not using it as an excuse to threaten whomever you may) is one of them. But in this situation, it seems as though the men struck first, last, and hardest.

You're right also, that they could have just ignored it. And, without video, there's no way to tell how intense the initial conversation was. But do you think asking to not be called slurs on the train deserves a response in physical force? And do you think being beaten by a group with a 2:1 ratio on your own does not deserve a response in physical force?

I'm not suggesting "shooting up a train station," I'm suggesting using a firearm to deter a group of men that are beating you.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

why should it be the victim's responsibility to engage in a firefight just to exist in society?

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

There are more guns than people in the US. Gun violence there is rampant, more children are killed by guns than by cars. The cause of the gun violence IS the gun ownership. It’s the idea that when you have a problem - even a physical one - that the solution is a gun. That idea is unique amongst war-torn countries and the US. So no, shooting up a train station isn’t rampant gun violence. But the idea that you ought to is.

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

But the idea that you ought to is.

But that's not the idea: self defense is not the same as a mass shooting, and you refusing to differentiate that gives me the vibe you aren't arguing in good faith.

The UK doesn't have gun violence, they have knife violence. So are you going to tell someone not to carry a knife for self defense because it's a potentially deadly weapon?

that the solution is a gun.

Sometimes it is, bud, welcome to the real world. If you're being attacked, especially if you're outnumbered, your argument is basically "you should have talked your way out if it, or just taken the assault, rather than use a tool you may legally be allowed to use to protect yourself." Do you ask rape victims what they were wearing before the assault too?

They clearly couldn't rely on bystanders to intervene, like people attempted to for George Floyd, and the victims were outnumbered and clearly overpowered. Had one of them been carrying a firearm, the assholes who just assaulted two people for existing may have been deterred.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

lol, you think only the victim will have a firearm?

you don't think that if the victim pulls, the fuckheads will keep their firearms stowed and just accept it?

they aren't wrong: gun violence is the result of too many guns in too many hands.

when these victims begin to light up the assholes, and a firefight erupts, will it be better that innocent bystanders are dead for freedumb?

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 days ago

All self defense classes should be mma. If you are learning anything else you are wasting your time. Mma teaches you the footwork needed to stike on the feet, defend Takedowns, clinch and submissions.

[-] microphone900@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago

Oh, so one of the cities with the lowest levels of racial equality also has a problem with transphobia? I'm not shocked, I'm not surprised. Between this and the people in Springfield Ohio instilling fear in the towns Haitian residents, I will never understand how people can become so hateful.

[-] kvasir476@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

It should not be forgotten that it was not the wider 'people of Springfield' who pushed that shit. There were certainly kooks/nazis in Springfield who were willing to say it, but the responsibility falls on the politicians/media organizations who maliciously propagated it.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 4 days ago

People are emotional, tribal, creatures. It's very easy for us to hate the out group. That was probably beneficial for pre-history humans, where the other tribe could be a real threat. It's not so useful today, where "the other group" is just some people waiting for the train.

I think the best paths forward have to make people believe more people are in-group. That's a reason why stuff like representation matters. People might be like "who cares if there's a trans main character in a movie?", but that helps people be less hateful. They don't hate the character from the movie, they relate to them, and then a person in real life gets seen in that light.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

I don't understand why people think it's a good idea to express themselves in a specific way if it WILL turn out badly for them. That's just plain stupid and dangerous. Don't get me wrong though, I fully believe people should be able to express themselves however they want. But that doesn't mean one should walk around a warzone and think they wouldn't get a bullet in their face because they oppose that war. Same goes for equality in a city without equality.

Stay safe.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
94 points (95.2% liked)

Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro

550 readers
10 users here now

About

A community for leftists and progressives within the Minneapolis - St. Paul Metro Area, including all suburbs and exurbs.

Community banner courtesy of @maven@lemmy.zip ❤️

Guidelines

  1. Be nice

  2. Comment substantively

  3. Probably some other stuff

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS