503
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 26 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That is women literally choosing the bear (by not voting or who voted Trump, same thing).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

If there isn't a movie yet where a woman meets a strange man in the middle of the woods and he starts acting creepy and she gets scared, then she sees a bear and decides to chance it with the bear... and then the bear runs past her and mauls the creepy guy-

Well there should be.

[-] squid_slime@lemm.ee 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

2020 election.

Its cultural, men are more likely to be Republicans. One day this will change

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 16 points 7 hours ago

If no woman will consent to a guy like that, he’ll just vote for the candidate who promises to abolish consent

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 38 points 9 hours ago

I mean, it sounds to me like men also chose the bear. Why did they choose the bear, is it because they're stupid? Probably not, they likely just thought their odds were better with the bear.

Dropping the metaphor, and looking in the cold light of day, those young men saw a better future under Trumpler than Harris. Articles signaled this well before, and nothing was done to address it.

Will their future be better - probably not. Can they be made to think their future is better, that's a tough one. Remember, you can trick one group of people into thinking they have more rights by stripping the rights of those around them.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 135 points 14 hours ago

When Harris was nominated, I told a friend of mine that my biggest fear was it was going to energize racists and sexists because she was black and a woman. I though she was great candidate, but the level of racism and sexism in this county is beyond insane.

[-] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 9 hours ago

Well it's a good thing your worries were unfounded then because Trump got 72 million votes in 2020, and as of right now he's got those same 72 million votes in 2024. 10 million or so democrats sat out this election compared to 2020 and that's why Harris lost.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Maybe we're a bit more racist and sexist than people are willing to admit?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 28 points 10 hours ago

It was actually because they gaslit people into believing that Biden was a competent candidate until like 3 months before the damn election.

THEN didn't even hold a primary.

And then let Kamala Harris completely train wreck the campaign and say shit like 18-24 year olds were stupid (notice how most of those votes from men for trump were around that age?) And sure, the video was taken out of context but she did say it and these dumb fucks didn't care what the context was when they see that clip droning on their TikToks and shit.

America does have a racism and sexism problem but to tell yourself that that is the only reason she lost this election would be lying to yourself in a very major way.

I did vote for her too, btw. First time I ever voted. But Jesus Christ the democrats just seem like they don't want to win at this point.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 23 points 11 hours ago

Thankfully it looks like that did not happen. So far Trump got less votes than he did in 2020. It's just that Harris did not manage to get the democratic voter base off the couch.

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago

People keep saying this but they haven't finished counting the votes. In California alone only 55% of votes were counted and he had 4,000,000+ votes there. The remaining votes could easily put him past his 2020 total.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 45 points 12 hours ago
[-] Linnce@lemmy.world 48 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 59 points 10 hours ago

"Boomers are turning this country to shit!"

GenX:

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 10 points 6 hours ago

Wish this would be adjusted for age. Obviously someone who had more time to accumulate wealth will have more wealth. The real question is how much wealth does each generation have at the same age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Well this here GenXer wishes he could have some of that wealth. Unless 'have a mortgage' constitutes wealth.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It actually does. The amount paid off at least, since the property is the wealth.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Considering how little we're going to get back when we sell it within the next few months before fleeing to the UK, I would say that I don't think it's wealth.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

Isn't the UK politics pretty similar to US?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

In the sense that the UK isn't likely to force my queer daughter into a conversion camp in the near future, no.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago

I would say it's roughly equally likely

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Right, because Labour, (and the Tories and the Lib Dems) are all totally homophobic just like Republicans.

What the fuck are you talking about?

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago

I'm just saying that I think this particular fear you have is roughly equally likely. Maybe the likelihood of it happening in the US is double or triple than the UK, but I think that would put the likelihood only from 0.01% to 0.03%, so basically the same.

Forcing queers (~8% of the population) in re-education camps would incite riots. They won't do it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Did you listen to the King's speech this year? I doubt it.

Did you know that the King's speech lays out government policy? I also doubt it.

Did you know that the King's speech this year included making conversion therapy illegal? I really doubt it.

Meanwhile, in the U.S., there's project 2025 and prominent republicans literally calling for trans genocide.

Forcing queers (~8% of the population) in re-education camps would incite riots. They won’t do it.

Yeah, remember how that happened in Germany in the 1930s when queer people were put in camps and then there was a big riot and they all got freed? No, neither do I.

Remember how it wasn't even legal to be queer in America until 2003? I do.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] obstbert@feddit.org 23 points 11 hours ago

I love how so many men in the comments are butt hurt by this comparison. Almost as if it hit the nail right on the head.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
503 points (86.8% liked)

Political Memes

5406 readers
5097 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS