this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
97 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8603 readers
214 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 100 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know not with what drugs Type 3 Diabetes will be fought, but Type 4 Diabetes will be fought with sticks and stones.

[–] DisabledAceSocialist@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Dear god, this is the best response I have ever heard and it has made my day. First the mysterious song gets found, and now this. What a month!

[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Aw, shucks. soviet-bashful Kind of you to say.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This made me laugh so hard dude. Very rare that a post can do that. I’ve been having a kinda shit time too, thanks for the mirth.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

?

It's a honest distrust. I'm no medic obviously.

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but "type 4 diabetes" is funny.

If you want the actual 10 year medical disaster from Ozempic my bet's on an exciting new kind of liver or pancreas failure.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Nah I wasn’t tryna be a dick, I just genuinely found the idea of type 4 diabetes really funny, and the gallows of humour of how bad ozempik is gonna fuck up an entire generation… it was just a chefs kiss combo for me

[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's other types lol, there's even a 1.5!

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] pooh@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m imagining 5 dimensional diabetes where Wilford Brimley is talking backwards and phasing in and out of existence

[–] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

im waiting for phen/fen part deux.

[–] macabrett@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

I've actually been traveling the world collecting all of the Diabetes. There's 7 of them and when you get them Ronald McDonald shows up and grants you a wish.

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does Ozempic do? Does it just make you less hungry?

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] REgon@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago
[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is there any evidence it's bad though? There's so much incredible modern medicine that has absolutely no downsides or side effects for 99.99% of the population, like vaccines

[–] sgtlion@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's so much incredible modern medicine that has absolutely no downsides or side effects for 99.99% of the population

This is just wrong to the point of being harmful misinformation.

Vaccines are probably the most amazing medicine, but they have (usually minor) side effects for basically everyone. I'm not aware of any medicine that doesn't.

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

but they have (usually minor) side effects for basically everyone

I meant side effects near the magnitude of "type 4 diabetes" haha

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

There's so much incredible modern medicine that has absolutely no downsides or side effects for 99.99% of the population, like vaccines

There's also the precautionary principle, which I think is the best way to approach food and drug safety: the thing in question has to be proven to be safe and contingencies have to be in place in case of harm before being released. This is opposed to the more US approach to food and drug safety, which requires proof that the thing is unsafe to proceed with regulation.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I know, it's just distrust

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Real, I feel the same about every new COVID booster