82
submitted 7 hours ago by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I’m going to posit an alternative theory: the data is actually pretty worthless and that’s why this company is going under. I don’t think these origin websites and the limited DNA sequencing they did is really worth as much as people might think.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 hours ago

Most likely it will all be bought and sold like everything in the world these days. No one cares about privacy or rights especially if it means millions of dollars of profit are on the line.

The biggest take away from all this is ..... never ever trust a corporation with your privacy.

Because eventually they will give up your privacy if it means they stand to lose millions or gain millions.

Be careful and always leary of new services and conveniences that will affect your privacy because eventually it will be bought and sold to the highest bidder no matter how you feel about it.

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

No one cares about privacy or rights

First Cambridge Analytica data scandal happend, then the whole world suddenly voted for right wing extremes.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

I guess I should have worded that differently .... no one cares if you can maintain your own personal rights or privacy because corporations view your rights and privacy as just another commodity ready to be bought and sold.

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

That's how I understood it and what I'm agreeing with. It's how companies like Cambridge Analytica came to be. How people came to be so manipulated.

[-] Alimentar@lemm.ee 0 points 3 hours ago

You do realise all these companies are left, where Musk and a hand few others are right, yeah?

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 20 points 7 hours ago

I have a relative who considered doing this test. I'm glad that the family talked him out of it. (Surprisingly enough, not just me.)

Anyway, my [hopefully not "hot"] take: for most part the data should be destroyed, as it involves private matters. If there's data that cannot be reasonably associated with an individual or well-defined group of individuals, perhaps it could be released into the public domain, but I'm not sure on that.

[-] SGG@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago

Stakeholders that want a payout will demand the data be sold to the highest bidder.

And other companies will probably be interested in said data and willing to buy.

I would like for it to be destroyed as well, but capitalism going to capitalism.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 17 points 7 hours ago

You're right. And IMO they should be legally banned from doing so - because the people who signed up for this crap agreed with 23 and Me's ToS, not with someone else's.

But, well... as you said, capitalism going to capitalism. The "right thing to do" is often out of the table of options.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Cute of you to assume it wasn't sold tho... JFC some "faith"

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 7 hours ago

Same thing that happened before that... The dsat got sold, at best "anonymized" 🤡

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
82 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

58697 readers
4109 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS