1662
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

It's as if theres some parasitic force siphoning all those dollars somewhere . . . oh right, there is.

[-] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

Admin and c-suite taking huge salaries and sucking companies, schools and agencies dry.

[-] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 67 points 1 day ago

Worker and Consumer Cooperatives should be the only way to form a business. Fuck external and unequal capital ownership by shareholders.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 22 hours ago

Germany has the right idea with their co-determination laws

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

True. I used to teach at a technical school, oh, a quarter century ago now. Seats were something like $500 per person, and I would have a class of 14 to 18 students. So $7,000 to $9,000 worth of tuition per day.

I was making $18 an hour, IIRC? $144 a day?

OH! AND I had to wear a suit and tie every day. So in addition to the usual expenses, there were also drycleaning bills.

After 9/11 class size shrunk to 2-3 people a day and the school went out of business.

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago

I do volunteer office work for a non-profit childcare center, and have looked at their budget and their books. It's basically impossible to efficiently do at the scale of a single center in a high cost of living city.

If you're paying teachers an average of $30/hour and maintaining a ratio of 4 kids to 1 teacher at all times, and covering 50 hours per week of operational time (for example, operational hours between 8am and 6pm 5 days per week), and you actually have enough staff to not pay overtime, that's $1500/week in wages per teacher, or $375/week per student. Throw in taxes, healthcare, paid vacation, and staffing in redundancy so that you can handle illness and the unexpected, and each kid might be at $400-450/week in labor costs of the direct work of watching and teaching the kids.

But in reality, childcare is in crisis now because a qualified worker could probably get a higher paying nanny job for 1 or 2 kids at a time, so there's a severe shortage of workers even at that $30/hour average wage. And so there needs to be overtime, and that creeps up to $450-500/week for workers.

And then you have the ongoing overhead: rent, utilities, furniture/equipment, toys, books, other supplies, etc. Most centers provide food, and have to contract out for that, too.

And then there's the cost of management. Someone needs to run the place, there might need to be something like a receptionist, and these centers often have to contract out their bookkeeping, electronic records, or even basics like running a website. Most have extra features like electronic reports and maybe even pictures/video for parents, and that costs money, too.

So even on the non-profit side, without a profit motive or distributions to shareholders, the industry as a whole has a mismatch between the prices parents are able to pay versus the bare minimum acceptable cost of providing that service. (In fact, the nonprofit I'm thinking of has donations coming in to cover things like tuition assistance for parents who need it, or a lot of the supplies, and volunteers like me who can provide specialized labor for no cost to the center.)

Childcare should be subsidized by the government, and there's basically no way this industry can continue to exist based purely on revenues from parents alone. Otherwise the industry will enter a death spiral and the number of people simply unable to afford kids will grow out of control.

[-] acchariya@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

MBA consultant:

Increase the ratio to 35 kids per teacher, add in a minimum wage helper to assist, and have an intern work reception while building the website. Extra services are subscription add ons.

Boom

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago

Or, hear me out here, fix the economy so that people don't need between 2 and 3 incomes per household to survive.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 23 hours ago

This person is soooo close to figuring out that the problem is capitalism. This is capitalism working as intended.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 16 points 22 hours ago

As we all know, you can't make a critique of capitalism without including "capitalism bad" in your critique.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago

Capitalism bad

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 1 day ago

Corpos have figured out the things people actually need and are gouging

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but if the people actually contributing the work and services to make the business any money at all, what would all the executives do for a living. Why is nobody thinking of them?? /s

Seriously though, it's one big legalised pyramid scheme - all the people doing the hard labour that actually make the world go round get paid the least while some guys get paid stupid money to sit in a board room and talk about strategies.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
1662 points (99.6% liked)

Political Memes

5346 readers
3062 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS