97
submitted 1 year ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chocodum@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago

Might I suggest accessing daily newspapers and magazines electronically with PressReader? You can do so for free (or tax dollars you are already paying lol) using your local public library card, if they are subscribed to this service.


With your library card:

Visit PressReader.com and click "Sign in". A pop-up labelled "Welcome to PressReader" will appear.

Click the blue "Library or Group" button on the lower left side of the pop-up. A longer pop-up labelled "Select Library" will appear.

Click "Search Libraries and Groups" and type in your city or local public library's name. A list of matching results will automatically appear as you type.

Click your library in the list of results. A new pop-up labelled "Library or Group Sign In" will appear.

If there are text fields for your Library card number and PIN, fill those in and click on the checkbox next to "I agree to allowing PressReader to verify and exchange my registration with my public library." Then click the green "Log In" button at the bottom.

If the new pop-up simply has a green "Sign in" button underneath your library's name, click it to be redirected to your local library's website to log in.


Unfortunately, not every public library can afford to subscribe to this service. Also, some libraries do not show up on the PressReader.com "Search Libraries and Groups" list even if they do have access available via their own website. If these instructions do not work, please visit your local public library website or branch for additional information or assistance.

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Thank you for providing this information.

[-] mack7400@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

And thank you for thanking them.

[-] baggins@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can PressReader give me daily notifications on my phone with news articles that are relevant to me?

[-] chocodum@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Great question!

The services I can think of that allow full-access aren't quite as easy to use as Google News at this time, but here is what I have come up with:

PressReader has a "For You" page that can show you top stories based on reader engagement from any of their publications. You can also create a PressReader account free-of-charge to follow specific publications, sections, journalists and interests.

Another service I would recommend to receive notifications is Canadian Newsstream by ProQuest. This service is a regularly-updated database of news stories from most major newspapers in Canada.

Note that licensing agreements restrict some publications' stories from being uploaded to Newsstream for one or two days, so I would recommend using this in addition to PressReader, which is more current.

You can use Newsstream to search for stories using highly-specific search queries, and request to be sent scheduled email or RSS alerts for any new query results once they are uploaded into the database.


PressReader "For You" Page

Once you have logged in to PressReader.com using your library card:

In the top left corner of PressReader, click "For You". The page will change. (Note that it may take a few minutes to load if the service is very busy.)

On the left side, there will be a menu with the following:

  1. "Language & Region", where you can select a country and language you would like to see top stories with;
  2. "For You", with top stories about different topics based on the Language & Region you chose;
  3. "Following", where you can see stories from your selected publications, newspaper sections, interests and journalists; and
  4. "Saved Searches", where you can save keyword searches to see if there are any new updates.
     

Note that 3. "Following" and 4. "Saved Searches" require a free PressReader account in addition to your public library access authorization. You can register for one by clicking the green "Sign up" button on the top right corner of the page after you have signed in through your public library.


ProQuest Canadian Newsstream

Your best bet to access this service is through your local public library's website. If they have it, you will most likely find a link to log into it in the "news" or "newspaper" section of the site's "digital collections", "digital library", or "bibliothèque numérique" page.

Once logged in, you will be at Canadian Newsstream's "Basic Search" page. You can begin keyword searching in the text field, or click "Advanced Search" underneath the main "Canadian Newsstream" header for more options.

Visit the ProQuest LibGuides for more information and instructions on creating library database search queries.

Once you have run your search, you will be at the results page. Here, you can edit your search query and change the filter settings on the left-side menu. Consider this a preview of the kind of stories you can choose to receive email notifications for.

When you are happy with the kind of results you see, click "Save search/alert" on the top right of the page just underneath the search bar. A drop-down menu will appear.

In the drop-down menu, click "Create alert" for email notifications, or "Create RSS feed" for a personalized feed you can add to your RSS reader. A pop-up will appear.

Follow the instructions in the pop-up, and you will be notified of new articles that match your search via email or RSS.

I would suggest keeping a different alert for each topic you want to follow. This will make it easier to cancel or adjust just one topic as you need to.

You can also create a free ProQuest My Research account so you can view and manage all your alerts all at once.


These steps are quite a bit more involved than simple Googling, but you get complete control over what you are searching for. The fact that you get to decide these small granular search parameters means that there are no secret algorithms deciding for you.

Thank you again for your attention. If you have any questions about using these services, I would encourage you to contact your local public library, where the staff will be able to assist you better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I don't know what the lawmakers expected. The bill is dumb. It'd be perfectly fine to require payment for copying a substantial amount of a new article (eg, if they want to prevent google from offering a public cache that gets around paywalls). But the bill outright requires paying to link to Canadian news sites in search results. That's outright madness.

Y'all can hate google and meta all you want. That's totally fine. I encourage you to use competing search engines (it's bad that Google has a near monopoly). But this bill is a bad bill.

The folks on this site might know about alternatives, but the average person doesn't. When the average person can't find Canadian news sites on Google, they're not going to switch to duck duck go or whatever. They're going to just use a non Canadian site. This bill is going to hurt Canadian news companies and it's disappointing to see people cheering it on because you're happier to see Google and meta hurt than you are sorry to see Canadian news sites hurt...

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

yeah the scraping content is the issue, not the linking. So this bill is pretty stupidly formed. They can simple require google/meta only provide line, title and max 250 letters abstract/trimmed first paragraph(excluding space and punctuation.)

They(Canadian medias) want the traffic to their site so they can display sponsor ads or sell subscriptions.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

It's the control over the advertising that's the issue. Scraping content is fine, as long as it's following copyright laws.

The issue is that the Toronto Star used to make most of their money by being able to offer prime advertising space next to its articles. The rest of their money was from subscriptions and newspaper sales, which people were willing to pay because it was the only way to get the news in a portable form.

More money for newspaper ads meant more money available to journalists, which made the advertising space next to those columns more valuable. It was a virtuous cycle where the better your journalists were, the more valuable the ad space next to them became. Nowadays, Meta and Google control that ad space and take a massive cut of any ad shown there.

At the same time, someone doesn't need to own a printing press to make an article available, thanks to the Internet. That means that mediocre quality "citizen journalism" and low-quality press releases compete for ad space in a way they didn't in the heyday of print journalism. The idea of "buying a newspaper" is gone and will probably never come back because mobile internet meant that getting access to news (and other content) was just so easy.

Meta and Google get virtually all their money from ads. The way to reduce their impact on Canadian journalism isn't to force them to pay some kind of "link tax", it's to address their ads monopoly and give back control over ads to the publishers.

[-] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I am not sure if I am missing something here, if directing the viewer to website and website display the content+ad, how does google take a cut? Google take a cut from sponsored link right? So if the media feel that paying for the link redirection is an extortion, then don't buy sponsored links right?

I am old enough that I know what news is like before internet, so to compete the eyeballs and attract regular/repeat users, your content needs to be in top quality. And we all know how it's not the "media" controlling ads, it's the other way around, it's who paid for ad space controlling the media. And to be honest, it was never a good healthy cycle anyway.(see TV ads, new paper ads, youtube ads, and intrusive web ads), faster and shorter engagement time means less conversion, and usually it means worse content overtime as sites try everything to prolong engagement time. (ie. sponsored content, embeded autoplay, more "next page", more "releated" "you might also be interested" links with clickbait title/thumbnail, etc, etc.)

People ARE statistics, there are portion of people that are considering buying certain thing, so owning your social interation/search data leads to higher associations, thus more effective ads. It's the sole reason why Google/Meta's business work, cause they can do user targeted ads.

Let's be honest, journalist quality is going down the drain as well. Like almost 30~40% of content is lagging social network for about minimum half day up toward a week. Maybe articles are just glorified blog post of referencing social media posts. Don't get me wrong, people do crave quality content articles, it's just that majority of time, even when posted to say special interest sub-reddit, the content itself is really lacking. ie. say, compare the hardware review from early 2000 and now(after 2020), it takes "longer" to get to the point, it was filled with many charts that aren't really interesting(cause we know benchmark and game performance are usually have special driver treatment etc.), less article explains the important architecture changes, how much it would affect your experience(just copy paste sponsor marketing material), talking about the hard points like is it worth the upgrade, longevity, etc. It's so bad that usually, asking in a specific gaming sub or discord about certain hardware gives you less biased feedbacks and chances are, they also give you links to cheaper vendor or links to price tracker. Hardware review sites gives you none of that(here is our sponsored market place, please support us by using the linkes below, blah.)

Last but not least, the intrusive full screen blocking shit when I just view the article's first paragraph and scroll 2 mouse wheel ticks down. How can a website expect me to subscribe without at least let me check 1 article? heck, like even 1 page or something before you pop that thing and ask me to subscribe. I am trained in a way that if I clicked an external link and see that full screen block, I just ctrl+w and close that tab. It is not worth my time. And I am the type of guy that whitelist sites that are actually helpful or pay visit often. The media sites aren't doing their best to keep or invite random visitors to come again. It's pretty much the same shit if you just scroll through Edge's suggested contents.( which I have to turn off everytime if the update reset my settings. ) They have to provide something where people are willing to stick around.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lungdart@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I believe the meta data of the links are scrapped from the meta tags in the header of the site. The info you see before clicking a link was configured by the host for that purpose.

[-] illidian@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I’m not sure what lawmakers were expecting. Don’t Canadian news sites make money off of ads and traffic to their site? Why would they require special treatment and compensation for merely linking to their news sites and articles?

[-] forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

The world wide web was meant to be more than a few tech bros with their tentacles on everything pulling it all towards a central point that is themselves. They're fighting for their monopoly here more than anything else. It's time for them to quit stifling innovation so the internet can evolve again.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

At the same time, the news industry has to be more than just Postmedia, BCE, Torstar and Rogers.

The issue is their domination of the online advertising space, not that they "steal" content from the news sources. Yes, they do get headlines, but then they direct people back to that media site to read the content. The real issue is that the ads on the social media post direct revenue to Meta/Google. The ads on the news media site send revenue to Meta/Google. They control the ads market on the buy side (people wanting to advertise) and the sell side (people wanting to show ads), and the exchanges between the two.

The big tech companies paying the big media companies for links is not the solution. It's a stupid idea and has failed everywhere it has been tried. The real solution is to break up the ads monopolies.

[-] CostcoFanboy@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

The amount of people that don't understand how important a news propagator like Google is is mind-blowing. Access to information is a right. This beats this right down to a pulp.

"HURR DURR GOOGLE BAD HUE HUE GOOD RIDDANCE HUE HUE I'M LE INTELLECTUAL"

Really sad. This fucked every news org. Hard. Except the big ones that own everything.

[-] dkbg@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Why should Google have control over the propagation of news? Everyone can still go to the individual news organisations' website...yes Google consolidated everything into one portal, but maybe it's time to go back to something less centralised, which isn't under the control of a single corporate entity, i.e. the way the web was originally intended to work.

[-] baggins@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Same reason you're using Lemmy and don't just go to browse every single individual website on the internet.

[-] dkbg@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

So then we need a non-corporate portal for news. Centralising the power of information distribution with massive companies that are driven solely by profit is not the way.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Use DuckDuckGo #BoycottGoogle

[-] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You mean I won't get ~~ads~~ news from Google anymore? Aww, shucks!

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

OH NO!

Anyway...

[-] HunterBidensLapDog@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago

I, for one, welcome this opportunity to spend more time on my local papers' websites.

[-] jinarched@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I use TOR.

Oh? You are a pirate? Or maybe a journalist in an authoritarian country perhaps?

Nah, I use it to read the news.

[-] CkrnkFrnchMn@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

The worst thing about Google to me is their grab on Android. Yes granted many software companies will not divulge the coding behind their apps but still. No way should Google have that much monopoly on an OS. You would think we would have learned our lesson with Microsoft but apparently not. I have de-google my life as much as possible and am starting to realize just how big Google Android ecosystem is. So...all that to say that yes...every thing that Google loses I'm all for it.

[-] illidian@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Apple enters the walled garden chat…

[-] dkbg@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

The core of Android is actually open source...if you install an aftermarket Android ROM like Lineage OS, you can avoid the closed source Google components (for the most part).

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Graphene OS is amazing, if you're degoogled. Terrible if you need Google, though.

I tried it and loved it until I tried to get my work Google account working, lol.

LineageOS is a good option if you still need Google on your phone since you can install GApps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] varsock@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

am I understanding it correctly that if I'm in Canada and search for, say ArsTechnica, or other news source, Google will not show those results to me? Like they indexed the site and will omit it from a search?

Or are they pulling news in their "cards" or whatever they call them when they show previews and users never enter the site. Havent used Google Search in so long don't even know what shenanigans they are up to.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As I understand it, they are pulling all links to Canadian news sources from search and from their cards, Google News, etc. So if you search for Canadian news you will not find it, unless international news organizations report it, and neither will you find world news reported by Canadian news channels and newspapers.

It might still be possible to use Google to search for Canadian news if you use a VPN and pretend to be in another country, especially if you do it from a browser that's not logged in to your account.

[-] varsock@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm having a hard time believing that is the case for "search." Cards and "google news" is another story.

As much as I dislike Google's practices, they are doing a service by indexing where websites are and allowing them to be found based on keywords.

I feel if I go to "google.com" and search for Google should show me links to so that I can visit the site directly. Any law that retards that is shooting Canadian news outlets in the foot.

Now if Google somehow finds what you're looking for and does not take me directly to the website and instead parses the site, presents the content, and shows its own ads, as opposed to ads hosted on , then yeah - google can go play in traffic.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Greedy google doing greedy google things.

[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Greedy old news companies thinking they should be paid every time google displays a link or one of us posts to social media.. THe way the bill is structured links to news sites posted HERE on lemmy.ca may make lemmy.ca responsible for paying for them to the old news companies.

It's a bad law.

[-] Christos@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

F*ck these bozos who dont understand how much this is going to screw canadian news sites. They just see google gets owned and support whatever tf it is like sheep. Awful law

[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I am amazed at how people don't understand that vague law that takes out there "Current enemy" could be used against them down the road.. THERE IS NO SUPPORT OF GOOGLE or facebook.. it is a bad law that could be turned around to start playing whack mole with lemmy instances in the future, especially those run by a Canadian entity or on canadian hosting.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Iteria@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what they expected. An EU country (I can't remember if it was Spain or Italy) tried this and Google just left. Then the news outlets begged for the law to be repealed. Google has a monopoly on search. If people can't find you there, you're gonna have a bad time because of your traffic free fall.

[-] HunterBidensLapDog@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Australia with the kangaroos. Not Austria with the sound of music.

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

There are other search engines, and bing became a lot better with the gpt integration

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

As annoying as this is, I hope it will push news outlets to consider other funding models. Getting subscribers to pay for journalism seems much healthier than subsisting on ad clicks.

The Globe kinda does this with their soft paywall. The ex-Irving papers in NB seemed to do pretty well with their hard paywall.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

They're all trying to get people to pay for journalism, but not enough people are paying.

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

CTV News doesn't provide membership/subscription options. Many newspapers don't even have a soft paywall.

[-] Album@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

It's a joke that Google calls this drivel news anyway. Good riddance.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
97 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
449 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS