-39
Russian shills should be banned from running to begin with. She should be banned just do taking Russian money, and for having trumps lawyers represent her in bad faith.
Everyone look at how OP engages with people in these posts. They are clearly here to spread propaganda and engage in bad faith.
This account was created fifty-one days ago and in that time has made four thousand and fifty-four submissions to Lemmy.
That averages out to one every eighteen minutes and six seconds twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
Sounds about right.
Quantity over quality.
Votes cast in Ohio for Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein will not count because the party nominated her running mate after a state administrative deadline, according to state election officials. [1]
[1] https://apnews.com/article/election-ohio-green-party-jill-stein-f3268366b754150877605a83a95ad0ec
Sounds like the only "accusations" should be leveled at Stein's campaign which, yet again, couldn't muster the basic competency to comply with state election laws and regulations... despite having 4 whole years to prepare. It's almost like the Greens aren't a serious political party!
Does this wreck her chances of becoming President?
She'd had to of had a chance to wreck it. The fart in the wind has more chance at a positive impact than any third party presidential candidate.
The Plain Dealer - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Plain Dealer:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2024/09/its-a-mess-accusations-traded-over-how-jill-stein-got-disqualified-from-running-for-president-in-ohio.html
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
-39 points (6.7% liked)
politics
18930 readers
3134 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS