100
submitted 1 month ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago

Tencent will grow to become the anti-Steam, mark my words. They already have their grubby mitts all over devs worldwide, and every single one will live to regret it (or their players, at the very least).

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 38 points 1 month ago

Not just games, movies too. And anything that gets Tencent money ends up with subtle pro-China propaganda.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

they own WeChat too, China's biggest chat app, also used for bill payment and government tracking.

[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying there isn't, but do you have some examples of pro china propaganda in games and movies? I heard something about the live-action mulan movie being filmed in xinyang, but besides that i haven't personally noticed anything.

[-] wolfshadowheart@leminal.space 8 points 1 month ago

It's more about the scripts being given a passover of approval from the CCP. Want your movie in China? Usually, there's some adaptation for the region, no big deal. However, I remember articles coming out about how the movie adaptation may not be accepted if the U.S. version doesn't fit the standard, meaning the U.S. version would have changes made at the suggestion of the CCP.

Sorry for the NYT link, but it has some examples

[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh thankyou! Yeah that does make sense. That is pretty messed up.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I haven't played in a few years, have they done any of that in EvE Online?

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

You say that like they don't own a sizeable chunk of Epic.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

exactly they are already doing it.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's okay. The Fediverse assured me again and again it won't matter how much Tencent owns of your company so as long as you "don't think about them (Tencent)". Whatever that means.

[-] Kayana@ttrpg.network 33 points 1 month ago

Not only is that headline's grammar exceptional(ly bad), for a moment I thought the developer of Control was named Alan Wake. Like, how did they manage to butcher that so badly?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

No, it doesn't say "Control developer Alan Wake ..."

[-] thisisdee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If that’s what they meant, there would have been a comma after “Control developer” I believe.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

This is not the place for commas. This calls for a slash.

Alan Wake / Control developer agrees

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

That's a perfectly normal headline composition.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

That doesn't mean it's good.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Sure, but "good" is subjective. I had no confusion from the headline and like that it was direct and to the point.

[-] Banichan@dormi.zone -4 points 1 month ago

I can tell you weren't on newspaper staff

[-] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

News headlines aren't limited by space on physical paper anymore. If your headline is confusing because of traditions based on outdated limitations it's not a good headline imo.

[-] notaviking@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah I feel there is a weird history between steam and remedy media. Like I remember when you could one day buy Alan Wake like really cheap since it was being taken off steam. Then the Epic deal making Alan Wake 2 exclusive basically meant they excluded a lot of customers immediately on steam.

[-] NoMoreCocaine@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

I know a guy who's been working there for well over a decade, I wonder if he's got any insights on this weird behavior they've been doing. He's got no power over financial decisions, so it's not likely he's got any details.

[-] notaviking@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I understand that Epic funded their project to be an Epic exclusive, but was that a financially sound decision excluding the major market place. Could they not have worked in like a two year or three year exclusive period

[-] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

and who exactly have they excluded? aside from the steam deck users every steam user can easily use epic game store

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

People who don't want to use the epic store. That was me. I just don't want another launcher, another account. I'll get around to it at some point I'm sure but I didn't buy AW2 and probably would have if it wasn't an exclusive.

[-] NoMoreCocaine@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

Me? Granted I get all their games for free (thanks dude!), but I definitely won't use Epic store. Would have gotten it for free if I used it, though.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

That's too bad.

[-] Floey@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

If they need money honestly Tencent is better than a lot of the alternatives who might be willing to invest.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
100 points (94.6% liked)

Games

32551 readers
463 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS